All pb
>>24318325 (me)
>>24323477 (also me)
Did we hit [0:00]?
Per the above, this Question has been popping up more frequently…at least on my radar.
Given the importance of the ‘timestamp’ or ‘time stamp’ Q emphasized (25 times),
I always check ‘em out and can’t help but marvel at how the Q/Q+ team manages to
cut through the ‘fog of war’ with meaningful messages for anons, while BTFO outta those
they are shining the light on or for.
That said, I’m not sure exactly how to answer the question, since it’s not quite as
straightforward as the early days. However, when the anon dropped the notable in
>>24324470 …well…I’ll just leave the picrels here for others to judge. And fwiw…
That ‘no coincidences’ tagline been showing up a lot for me here and IRL, too.
And the sauce? See the (also me) post above then check out Q #477.
What a time line!