>>2433625

>>2432794 (LB)

If we had a way of ranking the quality of our proofs I'm fairly certain that most anons would rank all of the POTUS hand waves, sign language, and pointing in the direction of homemade Q signs and cutouts at rallies very low on the list. They simply aren't proofs. At best they're wishful interpretation by devout believers, at worst they're easy fodder for MSM to ridicule us and our movement.

I'm not saying that some of these signals aren't real, maybe some of them are legit shows of support by POTUS. I'm just saying they aren't sufficient to convince most rational people (even if we had neutral press reporting on them).

>>2433883

I said nothing about quotes.

Quotes by Q immediately repeated by POTUS are good. Hand signals, not so much.

>>2433986

No I cannot, and I think this is intentional on POTUS part. I'm not a Q doubter by any means. I'm just a skeptic anon who is in favor of putting our best proofs forward, and disregarding some of the weaker ones that tend to be more subjective interpretation than proof.

POTUS RT

This ought to scare the fuck out of (((them))).

https://twitter.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1025071229835927554