Spanberger Is Agent Double-O-2028
Mar 3 2026 (excerpts / part 1 of 2)
—
Democrats are pitching Spanberger as a moderate and will doubtless tout her career as a CIA operations officer (2006-2014) as proof of bravery, competence, and patriotism. As the people should know, it is that very experience that should hoist the caution flag high.
“Intelligence officials abuse their positions to discredit opposition to the Democratic Party, of which they are part,” noted the late Angelo Codevilla, one of the few who, because of his role working on the Senate Intelligence Committee, was able to see everything the CIA wanted money to do. “Complicit with the media, they leverage the public’s mistaken faith in their superior knowledge, competence, and patriotism to vilify their domestic enemies from behind secrecy’s shield.” As Spanberger knows, CIA partisanship is no secret.
In 1976, John Brennan voted for the Stalinist Gus Hall for president. He was the candidate of the Communist Party USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Soviet Union. Instead of showing him the door, the CIA hired Brennan, and in 2013, the president formerly known as Barry Soetoro, and known today as Barack Obama, put him in charge. In 2020, Brennan authored Undaunted: My Fight Against America’s Enemies, at Home and Abroad, a bellicose replay of the Russia hoax, which the author played a role in creating.
Last August, Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard released a report confirming that Obama administration officials “manipulated intelligence” related to the 2016 election. The report cited FBI Director James Comey, DNI James Clapper, and CIA Director John Brennan as key players. Rep. Spanberger was all-in from the start.
“I think it is detrimental to our national security that we have an administration that is so willing to discount the information provided by our intelligence community,” Spanberger told reporters in 2018, “The fact that our president would at times seemingly take the side of foreign adversaries over the well-sourced intelligence of the intelligence community is troubling as an American—not just as a former intelligence officer.” According to Spanberger, the one who politicized intelligence was then-CIA Director Mike Pompeo.
“I never felt, as a former intelligence officer, that he understood the real value of the intelligence community and the purpose of intelligence,” Spanberger claimed. “His willingness to let the administration politicize the intelligence community was concerning to me.” In the style of Saul Alinsky, the CIA vet accuses the opposition of the very thing she is doing, but there’s more to it.
In 2020, Brennan signed the letter calling the Hunter Biden laptop Russian disinformation. So too did former CIA operations officer John Sipher, who has been featured in Spanberger’s ads. Further examples of CIA politicization were soon to appear.
In 2023, former CIA analyst John Gentry authored Neutering the CIA: Why US Intelligence Versus Trump Has Long-Term Consequences. As the author explains, “the politicization of intelligence was aimed at Trump,” and “the political culture of some IC agencies remains intact, available for reactivation in the event of another serious candidacy by Trump or the election of another Republican president.” Despite at least two assassination attempts, Trump is now president, so we have to assume they are “reactivated” in the fight against him. “Politicizing the CIA” would have been a more accurate title for Gentry’s book, but the agency had already been “neutered” in other ways.
—
Spanberger was still in the CIA when John Brennan took over in 2013. According to the undaunted Gus Hall voter, “jihad is a holy struggle in pursuit of a moral goal,” and “violence and jihad are not necessarily synonymous.” On Sept. 11, 2001, Brennan wrote, “we learned that the Pentagon had been attacked,” so the mighty CIA knew nothing in advance about the worst attack on the United States since Pearl Harbor.
On Brennan’s watch, the CIA failed to prevent terrorist attacks at Fort Hood (2009), the Boston Marathon (2013), San Bernardino (2015), and Orlando (2016), all with massive loss of life. No word from Spanberger if the Fort Hood attack was “workplace violence,” as then-President Obama claimed. On the other hand, the Virginia Democrat shares CIA fascination with reality dysphoria.
https://chroniclesmagazine.org/web/spanberger-is-agent-double-o-2028/