Anonymous ID: 9cf33e March 4, 2026, 7:02 a.m. No.24339558   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9568

>>24339545

Too complicated.Who would own the copyright?

  • The owner of the data center in which the AI resides?

  • The owner of the artwork used to train the AI?

  • The person who instructed the AI to draw the "artwork"?

  • The person(s) who developed the AI's code?

 

The list goes on and on.

Anonymous ID: 9cf33e March 4, 2026, 7:13 a.m. No.24339598   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24339568

>It's just a tool.

Yes and no. OpenAI and Microsoft are already caught up in a lawsuit for their AI outputting "copyrighted" source code (scraped from Github) when a person asks it to "write a piece of code". The code output was an exact duplicate of other author's code, but with the credit removed. This is an ongoing lawsuit. All the original authors are asking for is for them to be properly credited in the output code. Microsoft/OpenAI claim that they have no control over what specifically gets output by the AI model.

Anonymous ID: 9cf33e March 4, 2026, 7:17 a.m. No.24339615   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9620

Damn, so much deflection. A MN Fraud hearing is now talking about ICE / DHS?

 

The chair should not allow this bullshit to take place.

Anonymous ID: 9cf33e March 4, 2026, 8:03 a.m. No.24339851   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9868

Democrat showboating is all I hear. These congressional investigations are a complete waste. Just forward the data to the DOJ and instruct them to indict these assholes.