4 Mar, 2026 20:291/3

Türkiye has entered Israel’s threat narrative. What’s next?

Will Ankara become West Jerusalem’s next target if Iran is neutralized?

(By Farhad Ibragimov – lecturer at the Faculty of Economics at RUDN University)

Former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett recently made a bold statement regarding Türkiye and its President, Recep Tayyip Erdogan,effectively labeling Ankara a new strategic threat to Israeli security. Bennett accused Türkiye of supporting not only Iran but also several groups in the Middle East that Israel classifies as terrorist organizations.

In an interview,Bennett described Erdogan as a “sophisticated and dangerous adversary who wants to encircle Israel.” He urged Israel andits allies not to “turn a blind eye” to Ankara’s actionsand develop a comprehensive policy of containment. He emphasized thatthe strategy should address not just Tehran; systemic measures must also be taken in regard to Türkiye. While Bennett did not specify particular pressure tactics, hisrhetoric implied that Israel needs to formally recognize Türkiye as a hostile nation.(Israel’s war was never just Iran or one nation, it’s about all nations to control and if the can’t, then to destroy them. They believe Israel is the only power that should exist.)

Bennett’s assertion about the emergence of what he termed a “monstrous axis” of Islamic political forces deserves special attention. He claimed thatQatar and Türkiye, acting in Syria and Gaza, are bolstering networks linked to the Muslim Brotherhood. He also hinted at Doha’s financial and political influence over certain Israeli officials, adding an additional domestic political layer to his statements.

Bennetthad earlier articulated the notion of a “new Turkish threat” at a conference of American Jewish organizationsin Jerusalem. He mentioned ascenario where Ankara could align with Saudi Arabia and Pakistan in a potential military-political pact, predicting this would create a new center of power with regional ambitions.

Point of no return

Thedeterioration of relations between Türkiye and Israel has been gradualrather than abrupt. Since Erdogan’s rise to power and the strengthening of his Justice and Development Party,Ankara’s foreign policy has become increasingly ideologized.The concept of political Islam that underpins the party’s ideologycalls for a strong support of the Palestinian cause and views Israel as an oppressorof the Palestinian people. This shift has naturally impacted bilateral relations.

For a long time, Türkiye attempted to balance among various power centers. On the one hand, as aNATO member and regional neighbor, Ankara aimed to maintain strategic ties with Israel, while on the other, itsought to assert its leadership in the Muslim world. This dual approach drew criticism from both sides: Islamic nations accused Türkiye of not taking a firm enough stance against Israel, while theWest criticized it for excessive politicization and an anti-Israel rhetoricthat fell short of the expectations of its NATO allies.

One of the mostsignificant and symbolically transformative episodes in Turkish-Israeli relations was the Mavi Marmara incident in May 2010. This largely set the course for the subsequent deterioration of bilateral ties between the two countries.The MV Mavi Marmara ship was part of the so-called Gaza Freedom Flotilla, which aimed to break the Israeli naval blockade of Gaza by delivering humanitarian aid. The mission of the Freedom Flotilla was to break through the naval blockade imposed by Israel after Hamas came to power. Israel viewed this as a breach of security and a potential threat, asserting that the cargo could be used for military purposes.

During theinterception operation, Israeli soldiers boarded the vessel in international waters. The situation escalatedinto a violent confrontation and resulted in the deaths of several Turkish citizens. This prompted a fierce reaction from Ankara, with Turkish officials condemningIsrael’s actions as a violation of international lawand demanding official apologies, compensation for the victims’ families, and the lifting of the blockade on Gaza.

The Mavi Marmara incidentbecame more than just a diplomatic crisis; it marked a turning point in Türkiye’s relations with Israel. Türkiye recalled its ambassador, downgraded bilateral relations, and effectively dismantled military cooperation, which had been a cornerstone of cooperation between the two countries. The Turkish public came to view Israel as a state that used force against Turkish citizens engaged in a humanitarian mission. Conversely, in Israel, the incident reinforced the view of Türkiye as a supporter of political factions hostile to Israeli policy in Gaza.

https://www.rt.com/news/633795-is-turkiye-next-after-iran/

>>24345785

2/3

Despite subsequent attempts at partial normalization of relations, including apologies and discussions over compensation,trust was never fully restored. Moreover,the Mavi Marmara incident represented a point of no return: while prior to 2010, tensions were primarily rhetorical and ideological, afterwards they became more permanent and official.

From diplomatic strain to strategic distrust

Since then, every escalation of the Israel-Palestine conflicthas automatically impacted relationsbetween Ankara and West Jerusalem. The events of 2023 only exacerbated the existing mistrust: the tragic events of October 7, 2023, followed by Israeli military actions in Gaza led to a further deterioration of relations. Ankara’s response was highly critical – the Turkish authorities publicly called the actions of the IDF disproportionate and condemned mass civilian casualties in Gaza.From that moment on, bilateral relations became ‘frozen’ and were characterized by a confrontational rhetoric and strategic distrust that was close to a ‘cold war’.

Within the Israeli political landscape, some advocate for a more rigid stance towards Türkiye,while others favor a more pragmatic approach; however, the general stance regarding Türkiye is similar. Naftali Bennett has long been known for his staunch anti-Turkish position, viewing Ankara as a potential strategic adversarythat could emerge as Israel’s next significant threat after Iran.

In contrast, Prime Minister BenjaminNetanyahu, despite his personal animosity towards Erdogan and occasional sharp remarks,typically adopts a more pragmatic approach. His rhetoric often leaves room for possible normalization, grounded in the idea that Türkiye and Israel do not have a direct territorial conflict and that there is potential for economic and energy cooperation.

Anotherpoint of contention for Israeli leadership is Türkiye’s growing ties with Islamabad. Pakistan is the only nuclear power in the Muslim world with a firm anti-Israeli stance, and Israel views the deepening military-political relationship between Türkiye and Pakistan as the emergence of an alternative power center.Netanyahu had indicated that, following Iran, Pakistan may come under scrutiny as a potential strategic threat to Israel. Meanwhile, Bennett appears to shift the focus more squarely onto Ankara.

Interestingly, similar assessments are being echoed beyond Israel’s borders. American journalist Tucker Carlson recently remarked that Türkiye poses a unique challenge for Israel precisely because its foreign policy is difficult to control and does not fit into rigid alliance structures.

The politics of persistent threat

From Israel’s perspective, it is clear that regional security extends beyond just Iran. Even if the Iranian factor was neutralized or considerably weakened, WestJerusalem would need to redefine the source of the next long-term challenge to its security. Israel traditionally conceptualizes threats in multilayered terms,where removing one pressure point often brings another to the forefront. Netanyahu is navigating a complex situation. Israel is shaken by political disputes, societal divisions, pressure exerted by the security forces, and the ongoing war. In this context, Netanyahu is trying to persuade the Israeli people that national security remains a top priority and that threats persist.

In Israel, the theme of external danger generally unites society. When faced with a serious threat, political disagreements tend to recede into the background. Therefore,discussions about who might pose the next challenge after Iran are not merely strategic or foreign policy considerations; they also have significant implications for domestic politics. The government must demonstrate that it has control over the situation and is prepared to confront any potential adversaries.

https://www.rt.com/news/633795-is-turkiye-next-after-iran/

>>24345791

3/3

The narrative surrounding the so-called “axis of resistance,” which traditionally encompasses Iran and its proxies,is gradually expanding within the rhetoric of certain Israeli politicians. Now, in addition to Tehran, Ankara and Islamabad are also mentioned as potential power centers capable of limiting Israel’s maneuverability in the mid-term.

Türkiye is seen as a nation with ambitions for regional leadership, an independent defense industry, andan ideologically driven foreign policy. Pakistan, on the other hand, is viewed as a nuclear power with a deep-seated anti-Israel stance== and growing ties to Ankara. From Israel’s strategic perspective, this configuration is perceived as a potential new element of pressure.

Not a new war – yet

Israel has consistently maintained that it views Iran, Türkiye, and Pakistan as rivals that are different in nature, but comparable in scale. The only question is which nation will become Israel’s next priority.

Considering likely scenarios,Türkiye may emerge as the more probable adversary. However, Israel will approach the matter with extreme caution. Firstly, Türkiye is a NATO member, which complicates any direct confrontation.Secondly, personal relations between Trump and Erdogan prevent a radical stance towards Türkiye in US foreign policy, thereby limiting space for direct Israeli pressure.

Nonetheless, Israel is known for its long-term strategy – a systemic approach that gradually creates a favorable international environment through collaboration with allies, sanctions, information campaigns, and regional alliances. This logic does not imply suddenly entering into a new confrontation but rather gradually building a deterrence infrastructure.

For now, Iran remains Israel’s primary adversary. However, Israel will continue to regard both Türkiye and Pakistan as potential competitors. For Ankara, this means that current disputes must also be viewed within the context of Israel’s long-term logic. The situation in the Middle East remains unstable, power dynamics can shift, but distrust among nations is unlikely to dissipate anytime soon.

(I said this yesterday, Israel isn’t fighting enemies, they are picking off each country one by one, because we are all enemies to them.And they think God would not allow us non Jews to inhabit the earth, unless Israel can control us as chatteland destroy their identity of all different races God created.Bibi doesn’t believe his people were made in the image of God, Bibi believes he is God. It’s obvious, hideously evil and just the way Bibi and the leaders want it.Be it known, Bibi is not even a Jew, as recited by Tucker. How did the devil get in the pack when the majority of Jews are good and holy people to the real God? ==That was the plan by the fallen ones when Moses left Egypt, embedded with Jews that hated Moses and created problems through the 40 years. The Bible comes in handy when discussing Israel today.

8Moses also said to Korah, “You Levites, listen to me. 9 You should be happy that the God of Israel chose you to be different from the rest of the Israelites. He lets you come near to him to do the special work in the Lord’s Holy Tent to help the Israelites worship him. Isn’t that enough?10 He brought you Levites near to him to help the priests,but now you are trying to become priests also. 11You and your followers have joined together and turned against the Lord!Did Aaron do anything wrong? No, so why are you complaining against Aaron?”

https://www.rt.com/news/633795-is-turkiye-next-after-iran/

>>24344993 LIVE: President Trump Hosts a White House Event - 3/5/26

>>24345139 @realDonaldTrump I am pleased to announce that the Highly Respected United States Senator from the Great State of Oklahoma, Markwayne Mullin, will become the United States Secretary of Homeland Security (DHS), effective March 31, 2026. The current Secretary, Kristi Noem, who has served us well, and has had numerous and spectacular results (especially on the Border!), will be moving to be Special Envoy for The Shield of the Americas, our new Security Initiative in the Western Hemisphere we are announcing on Saturday in Doral, Florida. I thank Kristi for her service at “Homeland.PN

It seems Noem and Lewindowski FAFO! It’s been a problem for a long time considering they are married to separate spouses

>>24344887, >>24344921 US President Trump demands immediate pardon for Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu so he can focus on the Iranian war.PN

What’s really happening. Bibi is going off on tangents and doing things they never planned, and he’s dumping his work on the US to run around and kill people they consider their enemies, instead of accomplishing big missions. Trump told Bibi you started this shitfest, you finish it.

>>24345532 Iran's Islamic regime officials are threatening to kill Iranians, even their children, who show even slight oppositionPN

Ironicly Iran just motivated the many 10,000s soldiers that were getting fatigued by the war in Iran when the heard the “religious leaders” will kill their children if they oppose these holy fucking nuts in charge. Every single officers, leaders and soldiers got the acceleration 10 cups of rage in their veins, to save the Iranian people and children from the devils.

These leaders saying they have to kill the children for being normal humans with souls, that abhor war

>>24345943. I meant American and Jewish soldiers

Jonathan Karl

@jonkarl

In a lengthy phone interview, President Trump marveled at the success of the military operation against Iran and expressed no concern about what comes next.

"I hope you are impressed," he said to me. "How do you like the performance? I mean, Venezuela is obvious. This might be even better. How do you like the performance?"

I said nobody questions the success of the military operation, the concern is what happens next.(he couldn’t give his own opinion because he’s only blasted him with lies for 8+ years)

"Forget about next," he answered. "They are decimated for a 10-year period before they could build it back."

3:26 PM · Mar 5, 2026

·

108.5K

Views

Jonathan Karl is fucking lucky, his station probably paid Trump to let the little rat have some airtime with Trump.

https://x.com/jonkarl/status/2029654727093325965?s=20

Just like Jake Tapper when he got time with Trump, he was so excited calling it in to CNN. I guess Trump believes any news will be good for his ratings.

Interesting strategy Trump is doing.

Jonathan Karl

@jonkarl

In a lengthy conversation just now, President Trump hit back at Tucker Carlson who called the Iran war “absolutely disgusting and evil.”

"Tucker has lost his way,” Trump told me. “I knew that a long time ago, and he's not MAGA. MAGA is saving our country. MAGA is making our country great again. MAGA is America first, and Tucker is none of those things. And Tucker is really not smart enough to understand that."

3:08 PM · Mar 5, 2026

·1M Views

That’s brutal Tucker told Megyn K that he talked with Trump a lot and spent a lot of time with Trump at the White House. He told Megyn he loves and supports Trump.

(Those insults are harsh especially when Tucker considers himself brilliant)

https://x.com/jonkarl/status/2029650210125652143?s=20

EXCLUSIVE

Trump says he’ll help pick Iran’s leader, predicts regime change in Cuba

The president told POLITICO that “Cuba’s going to fall,” revealed his growing frustration with Ukraine and discussed the uncertain search for a new leader of Iran.

1/3

President Donald Trump is on the warpath: In an interview Thursday, he dismissed concerns about the Iran war, told POLITICO the United States would help choose Iran’s next leader, predicted the downfall of the Cuban regime andattacked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyyand the tech giant Anthropic.

The president is facing domestic political backlash on numerous fronts, including criticism of the Iran war from within the MAGA coalition and unrelenting attacks from Democrats over the cost of living.

But speaking in a phone call Thursday, Trump was entirely on offense. He brushed off worriesabout the impact of the Iran war on gas prices and U.S. ammunition reserves, and he insisted that the military onslaught was popular with voters. Many recent public polls show the opposite is true, although a survey released Thursday by Fox Newsfound voters have mixed opinions on Iran.

“People are loving what’s happening,” Trump insisted. He predicted that Iran’s government would not be the last to buckle in a Trump-initiated confrontation:“Cuba’s going to fall, too.”

“We cut off all oil, all money, or we cut off everything coming in from Venezuela, which was the sole source. And they want to make a deal,” he said.

Intervention in Cuba

Asked whether the United States was playing a role in the Cuban government’s demise, Trump responded: “Well, what do you think? For 50 years, that’s icing on the cake. Venezuela is doing fantastically. [Delcy Rodríguez] is doing a fantastic job. The relationship with them is great.”

Trump also confirmed the United States is in touch with Cuba’s communist leadershipas instability on the island intensifies following the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro.

“They need help. We are talking to Cuba,” Trump said.

And he suggested the island’s worsening situation is partly the result of U.S. pressure, including cutting off the Venezuelan oil supplies that once sustained Havana.

“Well, it’s because of my intervention, intervention that is happening,” Trump said. “Obviously, otherwise they wouldn’t have this problem.We cut off all oil, all money, … everything coming in from Venezuela, which was the sole source.”

“How long have you been hearing about Cuba — Cuba, Cuba — for 50 years?” Trump added.“And that’s one of the small ones for me.”

Confidence on Iran

Speaking as U.S. military operations against Iran continue to dominate the administration’s foreign policy agenda,Trump indicated the United States intends to play a significant role in shaping Iran’s postwar political landscape.

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/05/trump-unleashed-president-bullish-on-iran-eyeing-regime-change-in-cuba-and-impatient-with-ukraine-00814292

>>24346084

2/3

Asked how much influence he expects to have over Iran’s future leadership, Trump replied: “I’m going to have a big impact, or they’re not going to have any settlement, because we’re not going to have to go do this again.”

“We’ll work with the people and the regime to make sure that somebody gets there that can nicely build Iran but without nuclear weapons,” Trump said.

The president also weighed in on the late Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s son, who is in contention to be the new supreme leader saying, “Now they’re looking at the son.The reason the father wouldn’t give it to the son is they say he’s incompetent.”

Trump emphasized the U.S. is going to “work with themto help them make the proper choice” because he wants to avoid having a head of Iran “that’s going to lead to having to do this again in another 10 years.”

Trump projected confidence about the campaign’s trajectory and dismissed concerns that rising gas pricestied to the conflict could hurt Republicans politically ahead of the November elections that could break the party’s power trifecta in Washington.

“People are loving what’s happening,” Trump said. “We’re taking out a threat to the United States of America, major threat, … and doing it like nobody’s ever seen before.”

Trump described the U.S. campaign against Iran as highly controlled while boasting about overwhelming military capacity despite Pentagon officials and Hill lawmakers’ concern over dwindling weapons supplies.

“We’re being surgical,” he said. “We have unlimited supply of weapons, unlimited. … We have thousands, thousands, of them.”

The president also painted a picture of Iran’s military capability being effectively dismantled.

“They have no navy. They have no air force. They have no detection of air. It’s all wiped out. Their radar is all wiped out. Their military is decimated,” Trump said. “All they have is guts.”

Impatience with Zelenskyy

Even as Iran remains a top focus, Trump said negotiations over the war in Ukraine continue.And he again expressed frustration with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/05/trump-unleashed-president-bullish-on-iran-eyeing-regime-change-in-cuba-and-impatient-with-ukraine-00814292

>>24346087

3/3

“Zelenksyy he has to get on the ball, and he has to get a deal done,” Trump said.

On the other hand, Trump saidhe believes Russian President Vladimir Putin is prepared to negotiate an end to the war.

“I think Putin is ready to make a deal,” he said. Trump has said that before.

When pressed on what Zelenskyy’s obstacle is to a peace deal, Trump declined to elaboratebut maintained that Ukraine’s leader is not showing enough willingness to negotiate.

“It’s unthinkable that he’s the obstacle,” Trump said. “You don’t have the cards.Now he’s got even less cards.”

‘I fired Anthropic’

Trump also stepped into the increasingly contentious dispute between the Pentagon and Anthropic over the AI startup’s refusal to give the military unfettered access to its technology.

“Well, I fired Anthropic. Anthropic is in trouble because I fired [them] like dogs, because they shouldn’t have done that,” he said.

And underscored his support for his Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

“You see how good Pete’s doing, and you see how good the military. And so we have an amazing military. The whole world is seeing that now I built the military in my first term, and I’m using it in my second term,” he said.

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/05/trump-unleashed-president-bullish-on-iran-eyeing-regime-change-in-cuba-and-impatient-with-ukraine-00814292

Leave the Kurds alone. We are not guns for hire’ says Iraqi First Lady

Mar. 05, 2026 • 2 min read

Amr Al Housni

"Too often, the Kurds are remembered only when their strength or sacrifice is needed," said Iraqi First Lady Shanaz Ibrahim Ahmed.

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates - Iraqi First Lady Shanaz Ibrahim Ahmed on Thursday issued a statement titled “Leave the Kurds alone. We are not guns for hire” in which she cited past examples of Kurds being “abandoned when priorities changed” in Iraq and Rojava (northeast Syria).

“It is very difficult, indeed impossible,for Kurds to accept being treated as pawns by the world's superpowers,” she said, coming amid contested reports of US-Israeli ambitions to arm Kurdish opposition fighters against the Iranian government.

The release of her letter was followed by Reuters publishing an interview with US President Donald Trump in which he said that he supports Kurdish opposition groups launching an offensive into Iran, saying, "I think it’s wonderful that they want to do that."

In the statement released by the office of the first lady, Ahmed, herself a Kurd, recalled the 1991 Kurdish uprising against theregime of Saddam Hussein, saying Kurds were encouraged to rise up but later left without support when the regime used helicopter gunships and tanks to crush the revolt.

She said those events remain deeply remembered among Kurdsand are commemorated as “Raparin.”

Ahmed also referenced developments in Rojava,where Kurdish-led forces that fought on the front lines against the Islamic State (ISIS) were left stranded by Western allies in January when the Syrian government launched a military offensiveagainst the Rojava administration.

"Today, the Kurds of Iraq have finally tasted a measure of stability and dignity in life. Because of this, it's very difficult, indeed impossible, for Kurds to accept being treated as pawns by the world's superpowers."

“Too often, the Kurds are remembered only when their strength or sacrifice is needed,” she said, appealing to all sides involved in the conflict to “leave the Kurds alone.”

Multiple sources told The New Region that neitherIranian Kurdish opposition groups nor people from the Kurdistan Region have launched a ground offensive into Iran, despite widespread media reports suggesting such an operation had begun from the western border.

The reports gained traction after journalists cited unnamed US officials claiming that Kurdish-Iranian militias had initiated or were preparing to launch a ground assault.

However, Kurdish opposition groups quickly denied the claims. Sources from the Kurdistan Freedom Party (PAK), the Komala party, and the Kurdistan Free Life Party (PJAK) all said no military operations had been carried out by Kurdish forces against Iran.

Officials from the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) also rejected the reports, calling them “false” and “fake news,” with Aziz Ahmed, deputy chief of staff to Prime Minister Masrour Barzani, stating that “not a single Iraqi Kurd has crossed the border.”

https://thenewregion.com/posts/4762

I bet Melani and her would get along well!

Father Chad Ripperger - Signs of the Mark of the Beast & Rise of the Antichrist | SRS #285

Released 5 hours ago

Father Chad Ripperger is a Roman Catholic priest, theologian, philosopher, and exorcist serving in the Archdiocese of Denver. He is the founder and superior general of the Society of the Most Sorrowful Mother (Doloran Fathers), a religious community dedicated to spiritual warfare, deliverance ministry, and the traditional liturgy.

Born in Casper, Wyoming, and raised in a devout Catholic family as the youngest of six children, Father Ripperger was ordained in 1997 with the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP). In 2012, he established the Doloran Fathers, serving as exorcist for the Diocese of Tulsa from 2012 to 2016 before moving to the Denver Archdiocese, where he continues his ministry. Bound by the discipline of clerical celibacy in the Latin Rite, he frequently teaches on marriage, family, virtue, and the spiritual life.

A classically trained Thomist, Father Ripperger holds degrees in theology and philosophy from the University of San Francisco, master’s degrees from both the University of St. Thomas and Holy Apostles College, and a doctorate in philosophy from the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross in Rome. His scholarship and experience make him a respected authority on demonology, angelology, spiritual warfare, and the integration of theological principles with psychology.

Through Sensus Traditionis Press, he has authored several influential works, including Deliverance Prayers for Use by the Laity, Dominion, and Introduction to the Science of Mental Health. Known for his clear, no‑nonsense teaching style rooted in Thomistic philosophy and Church tradition, Father Ripperger continues to give talks, conferences, and guidance on prayer, virtue, the sacraments, and protection from spiritual evil.

4:08:28

https://youtu.be/I2p_cfipbEw