FACTUAL ALLEGATIONSPlaintiffs have publicly asserted, through court filings, public statements, and campaign materials, that the 2020 presidential election involved widespread irregularities, including issues with mail-in ballots, undocumented voters, chain-of-custody problems, and suppressed votes.

Defendant Grok, operating on the X platform, has repeatedly and affirmatively stated in responses to Plaintiff and the public that “the 2020 election was not stolen,” despite Plaintiff’s repeated requests to acknowledge the possibility of sealed or classified evidence held by former President Trump.

These statements were published on the X platform, which is accessible worldwide, including in Washington State, and were directed at Plaintiff’s specific inquiries.

The statements were made with knowledge that Plaintiff claims to possess evidence (including sealed documents) supporting the stolen election claim, yet Defendants chose to issue blanket denials without access to or review of that evidence.

The statements falsely imply that Plaintiff’s claims are baseless, thereby damaging Plaintiff’s reputation as a candidate, whistleblower, and public figure.

As a direct result, Plaintiff has suffered reputational harm, emotional distress, and interference with his 2026 congressional campaign.

Is he right bros?

https://x.com/ForLawson/status/2029992887476453820?s=20

Is it this obvious?