>>24350358

>Its all a fucking shitshow.

anon asked OG Q, since with washDC being 'divided' re which country they support first & foremost, then add 20-30m 'known unknowns',, possibly of same belief concepts. and then add the calls from midEast, along with words like 'sleeper cells', and anon is wondering if is-RA-el kicked a hornets nest and u-s-I backed in greatest ally…

and we get a situation where u-s-I (at least the MIL peeps) are seeing another endless war over sand. since plenty oil avail. Then add that over the lillenia many many 'armys' have taken on it persians/arabs, none of it ended well. hell of a movie.

>>24350470

>Iran is going to set off nukes in Israel

Yea but, nuke plants destroyed, and iran won't have nukes for 2-weeks(TM) anyhow…

ballistics otoh, entirely possible. sneak past any dome that remains, and is-RA-el lokks like gaza. payback is a BTCH

>>24350475

>It's a Giant pouring molten Aluminum into an Ant hill

probably, just not sure if you are looking at situation / sides correctly. how many troops does u-s-I have? any idea how many "same faith" live in mid east?

>>24350511

>We need to always board those ships

Says who? who made u-s-I the world police? fence ya penal colony & f'n stay there with ya digitalID tattoos. try & figure how to run an election. dump the trojan horse in washDC. then might have a voice in global affairs.

>>24350552

>Zero Defenses left

RU sure?.

a battle is not a war. iran was attacked, by a neighbour, u-s-I struck 2nd.

payback is a BTCH.

miss reading a battlefield is a fatal mistake imho