The Republican Connection to Slavery

So, Dinesh D'Souza blames Democrat slaveholders but not Whig slaveholders? What about the fact that Abraham Lincoln campaigned for our three slaveholding Whig presidents – Wm H. Harrison, J. Tyler, & Z. Taylor? It does not seem that Lincoln was a committed abolitionist at all.

The Supposed Party-Affiliation of the Ku Klux Klan

In 1924. the Democratic presidential nominee John W. Davis denounced the Ku Klux Klan, while the Republican incumbent Calvin Coolidge avoided saying anything on the subject. The result was that the Ku Klux Klan supported Calvin Coolidge in 1924.

Dinesh D'Souza claims that the Ku Klux Klan was "the military wing of the Democratic Party." Anybody who went to school in the United States should know that no U.S. political party ever had a "military wing." Furthermore, the Klan of the 20th century often supported Republicans.

Citing Eric Foner Dinesh D'Souza calls the KKK "the military wing of the Democratic Party." What EF wrote is: "IN EFFECT, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic party, the planter class, and all those who desired the restoration of white supremacy."

Eric Foner, incidentally, is a neo-Marxist Jew from New York City. Dinesh D'Souza had to lean heavily on such disreputable sources for his book The Big Lie.

Only Democrats would make deals with Fascists? Really?

The USA and Fascist Italy had positive relations, during Republican as well as Democratic administrations, until the invasion of Ethiopia in 1937. Dinesh D'Souza wants to pretend that all men of good will saw Mussolini as a bad guy from the start, and that was not the case.

Segregationist Democrats were Conservative

There used to be conservative Democrats. D’Souza pretends that segregationist Democrats were leftists when in fact figures like Senator James Eastland (Democrat, Mississippi) were regarded as extremely conservative.

Conservative Democrats were not LIBERAL LIKE YOU, Dinesh. They tried to conserve the community school, States' Rights, individual rights, freedom of association, public morality, and LAW & ORDER.

Would you like to explain, Dinesh, what was conservative about federally mandated school-desegregation and forced busing? It looks like LEFT-WING TYRANNY to me, and that was the consensus among White people in the South. CONSERVATIVE DEMOCRATS OPPOSED THIS LEFT-WING TYRANNY.

Senators LYNDON B. JOHNSON and ALBERT GORE, SR. were NOT TYPICAL SOUTHERN DEMOCRATS. They both REFUSED to sign the 1956 "Southern Manifesto" of opposition to federally mandated racial desegregation.

Two of the 101 Southern politicians who signed the Southern Manifesto were Republicans from Virginia.

They claim, "Democrats voted against Civil Rights," or even, "More Republicans than Democrats voted for civil rights." Both claims are false. The vote was very regional. Not one Southern Republican voted in favor of that Act. The only Southerners voting for it were a few Dems.

Dinesh D'Souza himself has criticized the Civil Rights Act: "Am I calling for a repeal of the Civil Rights Act of 1964? Actually, yes. The law should be changed so that its nondiscrimination provisions apply only to the government."(Dinesh D'Souza, The End of Racism, 1996, p. 544)

Dinesh D'Souza says: "Every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature and signed by a Democratic governor." This is literally impossible, since most of those states had adopted anti-miscegenation laws before the Democratic Party even existed.

One state of the "Jim Crow South," West Virginia, received its segregation-laws under Republican rule, beginning with Arthur I. Boreman in 1863.

Eugenic Sterilization and the former Confederacy

The eugenicist movement was weaker in the former Confederacy than in the rest of the country.

While 32 out of 48 (67%) of the United States enacted eugenic sterilization laws, only 55% of former Confederate states enacted such laws, compared to 70% of the other States.

Eugenic Sterilization and Racial Segregation

17 states had MANDATORY racial segregation. Of these, only 9 (53%) enacted eugenic sterilization laws. 16 states PROHIBITED racial segregation: Of these, 11 (69%) enacted eugenic sterilization laws. There was NO RELATIONSHIP between racial segregation and eugenic sterilization laws.

23 out of 32 states that enacted eugenic sterilization laws had no mandatory racial segregation.

In fact, states with mandatory racial segregation were somewhat less likely to enact eugenic sterilization laws, compared to states without racial segregation.

The Southern Segregationist Migration to the GOP

White Southern Democrats started voting for the GOP because Richard Nixon in 1968 and 1972 seemed to oppose forced busing. This method of winning the segregationist vote for the GOP, called Nixon's “southern strategy,” was devised by Kevin Phillips.

Dinesh D'Souza tries to obfuscate the well known fact that most Southern segregationists switched to the GOP by putting the focus on Segregationist politicians, of whom very few switched parties.

Major racially motivated D to R switchers: S. Thurmond, J. Helms, T. Cochran, J. Tower, T. Lott Charles Pickering, James F. Byrnes, Albert Watson, William Cramer, Arthur Ravenel Jr., Dave Treen, James D. Martin, Floyd Spence, Bo Callaway, Iris Faircloth Blitch, Mills Godwin.

Not many segregationist politicians changed parties, because the Democratic Party continued to be dominant until 1980. Politicians like Senator James Eastland (who died in 1979) would have been less influential in the GOP. But those segregationists were conservative!

The Big Switch that Dinesh D'Souza Denies

Some significant public figures from the South who switched from the Democratic to the Republican Party are: John Tower, 1951; Strom Thurmond, 1964; Jesse Helms, 1970; Trent Lott, 1972.

More Democratic than Republican politicians voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964: in the House there were 153 D and 136 R votes in favor; in the Senate, 46 D and 27 R votes in favor. And of course it was signed by a Democratic president, sleazy LBJ.

In 1964 there were, from the former Confederacy, 12 Republican Congressmen and 1 Republican Senator (John Tower of Texas): every single one of them voted against the Civil Rights Act.

The racial attitudes of the two parties by 1983 can be roughly gauged by the Senate's vote on a holiday to commemorate MARTIN LUTHER KING. While majorities of both parties voted for the holiday, ONLY 4 DEMOCRATS – BUT 18 REPUBLICANS – VOTED AGAINST THE HOLIDAY.

A Misrepresentation of Both Parties

As it turns out, what D'Souza calls “the nazi roots of the American left” are, on the one hand, “progressive” Republicans, and, on the other hand, conservative Democrats that have now migrated almost entirely to the GOP.

D’Souza pretends that “progressive” Republicans and conservative Democrats were the same group. Furthermore, he wants us to believe that they were all left-wing Democrats. Clearly, none of them were left-wing Democrats!

Dinesh D'Souza on Andrew Jackson and Genocide

In America: Imagine the World Without Her, Dinesh D'Souza declared that "there was no genocide" of American Indians, that this was just another Big Lie by the left to make Americans ashamed of their country. But now Dinesh D'Souza himself is telling this "Big Lie."

"By some estimates, more than 80 percent of the Indians perished…. But there was no genocide. Millions of Indians died as a result of diseases they contracted from their exposure to the White man: smallpox, measles, cholera, and typhus…." (Dinesh S'Souza, A:ITWWH, p. 93)

"Today we think of Indians as tragic figures, woebegone on the reservation. But that's not how Andrew Jackson … saw them. Jackson knew the Indians were canny, organized, and strong…. We should not regard the Indians as passive weaklings." (Dinesh D'Souza, A:ITWWH, p. 102)

“What term other than genocide can we use to describe Democratic president Andrew Jackson's mass relocation of the Indians?” (Dinesh D'Souza, The Big Lie, 2017) "But there was no genocide." (Dinesh D'Souza, America: Imagine the World Without Her, 2014)

Dinesh D'Souza quotes Andrew Jackson out of context, "It was dark before we finished killing them," and leads his readers to believe that this refers to an act of genocide. In fact those killed (generally) were warriors fighting to the death in the Battle of Horseshoe Bend.

Dinesh D’Souza’s attack on Andrew Jackson as a “racist” would instantly be recognized and reviled as Cultural Marxist propaganda if it were not clothed in Republican partisanism.

What do you think President Trump would say about Dinesh D'Souza's attack on Andrew Jackson as a "racist," given Trump's admiration for President Jackson, and the fact that he has been compared to President Jackson (and likewise called a "racist")?

>>2436520

The incompetent foreigner made the mistake of challenging me to support my assertion that his book was full of half-truths. The whole point of issuing such a challenge is to say Gotcha! when there is a poor response or no response.

I posted the answer that I had formulated hours earlier, and D'Souza, instead of saying gotcha, had no comment – because I was clearly right.

You will note that there is about an hour's difference between my three posts responding to his challenge, and my follow-up comment about how he shut up after I put up. In the interim he started responding to criticisms from other people that were easier to handle.

I made lots of other anti-Dinesh posts, and I made some friends. Unfortunately most of those who "liked" my anti-Dinesh posts seem to be leftists, but an overt leftist is less reprehensible in my view than a foreign opportunist posing as a "conservative."

Dinesh D'Souza's idea of "conservatism" is very skewed.

What we call conservatism today is very different from what was called conservatism when National Review was founded in 1955. When National Review was founded, conservatism included Christian morality, but conservatives also supported racial segregation.

The identification of conservatism with Segregationism changed gradually during the 60s and 70s. By Reagan's time, conservatism had become heavily mingled with traditional LIBERAL ideas, like the infallibility of the free market. The racial motive was still present among conservative voters, but it could no longer be overtly stated. There is an interview where Reagan's campaign strategist Lee Atwater admitted this.

Dinesh D'Souza picks out ONLY the LIBERAL parts of what was passing for conservatism in Reagan's day, and pretends that these are the exclusive criteria of conservatism. Particularly absurd is the pretense that non-White immigration is conservative! For Dinesh D'Souza, to be called a "conservative" you must be an old-style liberal. What used to be the conservative position on race and immigration is now a disqualifier.

BS!

>>2436770

I am not siding with the Democrats you idiot.

I am pointing out how Dinesh Disinfo is liar and fraud telling half truths in order to make money and deceive conservatives and republicans.

History is history. Right or wrong it is what it is.

This post appears on Dinesh D'Souza's Twitter page:

https://twitter.com/twitter/statuses/926846123079331842

What follows is an obviously satirical song that has Democrats boasting of their racism and various unpleasantries that Cultural Marxist (Jewish) propaganda emphatically associates with racism. It includes the line, "Stick with us and we'll create an Aryan nation." In other words, it is a song that echoes D'Souza's own bizarre characterization of the Democratic Party, in his books Hillary's America and The Big Lie.

That already should be enough for somebody with an ounce of common sense to conclude that the song wasn't really made by Democrats. But there's more: one of the vocalists uses a funny voice. You have to be more than just poorly informed. You have to be very dim to think that this is real.

Nonetheless, a majority of the comments on D'Souza's post are from people who believe that it is real. (There are many more than I can show in a screenshot.)

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-sO5Vb8MnJH4/WgCFlLHXUwI/AAAAAAAAB84/OWkWAmz1K84z8pvUxlsA8uIfXM-mHEHowCLcBGAs/s1600/Dinesh%2Bhas%2Bstupid%2Bfollowers.jpg

It was so bad that a Jew, Rubin Friedman, felt obliged to explain to D'Souza's gullible goy followers that it was a joke.

I guess that I should not be surprised. If they could accept the rubbish that he has peddled in his books, then they are ready to believe anything.

It is really too bad that the eugenic sterilization movement initiated by Republicans more than a century ago did not make greater progress in raising the national IQ.

• • *

D'Souza apparently recognized later that his followers cannot tell whether he is serious or joking, and now tells them up front when he is joking.

https://twitter.com/DineshDSouza/status/927964619922116608

I could care less about those two idiots.

None of that information about Kessler was breaking news.

Well known before that rally that the Psyop team engineered.

I saw that quote you have from Spencer and it is another half-truth.

Dinesh, when he says that rights come from the government he means that they can and are taken away by the government. He is not saying what you INSINUATE which is that government is his GOD.

Dinesh, you are a despicable fucking liar and the republicans are going to regret believing your stupid bullshit history when the left EASILY refutes it and makes them all look dumb.

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-YVv4DYxSI3w/WhZgsU6ShXI/AAAAAAAACDU/i-lgBI3rDoI9UuWPYkLvHXgLk37BNQNXgCLcBGAs/s1600/Dinesh%2BD%2527Souza%2BCriminal.jpg