>>2436952 pb
This ones't not as awful as others, but still pretty poor. Let that be a lesson to those who read the media, that they don't really know shit, they just get paid to write about whatever is thrown on their desk (apart from the clown implants who of course are out to discredit/disinfo).
Clearly these people phone it in on a regular basis. Two different stories…and they can't even get the job of a "baker" right.
IF they aren't even interested in a story, they will fabricate shit or just say "believed to be", "allegedly" and other lazy terms to fill in their crap.
Remember years ago (5-10) some NYT writer admitted to entirely fabricating some stories he wrote…something that got a lot of attention, and it all turned out to be made up.
Fake news 101