>>24371565

>The only hard part about this

Actuarilarryly … there is a couple…

weel, sorta talking numbers really….like 10,000 drones VS 1x "blimp" (easy shot down?)…and thats the whole thing with ME right now, how much "ammo" / "defence" missiles etc for eact attck "defence"…so it's sorta a "how much ammo got"? how much can get to OVERSEAS region, in timely manner, to sustain, an ongoing war…, meanwhile dome is down, trains are down, tanks are north in a neighbours property, 15km attack zone on north border,

so back to ya 1x blimp / or a coupla a/c carriers… the spanish had 100's Gallions when attacked, so did vikings…

>>24371690

>9x 16 inch guns

sounds impressive, how fast can they spin on turret, since "bogeys all over" ?

>>24371701

>Here is a video of them being fired

Thankx but…if step back & look at bigger piccy, this ships at war, is so 1914 or 1935…sort of redundate imho, wars were fought at sea years ago, now just sitting ducks on the water

>>24371711

>the signal controlling the drone

assuming(?) there is a signal & not an onboard raspPie with set coords & a flight path?

>>24371713

>and could wipe out swarms.

I don't disagree, but talking firing from one position, with 10000's kms coastlines… drone swarm(S) all over… the basic issue imho is the single , obvious, target, / firing position, thats slow, ie old school waring imho