>>24376154 pb PB

>"This is a case about swinging dicks."

fixed it for ya

>The American legal system [The womens bathroom, and bath spa] has long been regarded as a place to resolve disputes [feminine issues and bathing] in a dignified and civil manner or,as Justice O'Connor put it, to "disagree without being disagreeable."1

[to bathe without being used as FAP material or being raped outright]

It [The ladies room] is not a place for vulgar barroom talk.[ or swinging dicks] Nor is it a place to suggest that fellow judges have "collectively lost their minds," [look between your legs, dick brains ] or that they are "woke judges [how bout sick judges]" "complicit" [ yes complicit] in a scheme to harm ordinary Americans [women]. That language makes us sound like juveniles, [teen juveniles to be exact] not judges [which you are not], and it [your actions] undermine [s] public trust in the courts. The lead dissent's use of such coarse [honest and on point] language and invective may make for publicity or entertainment value [as do naked women for you it appears] but it [a dick] has no place in a judicial opinion [womans bathing area]

>The lead dissent ignores [upholds] ordinary principles of dignity and civility. and [the majority decision] demeans this court. Neither the parties nor the panel dissent found it necessary to invoke such crude and vitriolic language [while subjecting women to crude, vitriolic and downright dangerous dicks].

Decorum and collegiality demand more.

[really? What now. Legalize rape?]

[Nah. This case is about swinging dicks for sure]

(KEK a bit haughty)