I think it's more accurate to say that some logic is based on facts
>>24379364 me
So, what are you trying to say?
The logic that you'll fall into a pit and get injured if there's one ahead is something most people would understand
If that's not possible, simply construct a different logic
And this isn't just a story for those who still keep running headfirst into the trap(This also applies to those who are capable of improving the problem)
Of course, I think that emotional logic also exists
>emotional logic
That would be the case when logical explaining something emotionally
Also, it might be defined that way when emotions are inserted into the logical explanation
Furthermore, wouldn't showing a path forward also be considered a form of logic?
Wouldn't it be fair to define logic as one of the processes of thinking?
>Ex: And this isn't just a story for those who still keep running headfirst into the trap(This also applies to those who are capable of improving the problem)
>24379412
I don't understand what you're saying, but I think the content of the post creates a kind of creative opportunity
>emotional logic also exists = reason not logic
Reasons, is a process of thinking
>Wouldn't it be fair to define logic as one of the processes of thinking
Isn't logic part of the thought process?
That was given as an example
Also discussed a different approach (logical construction)
I define logical explanation and the aggregation of details in that way
Are you not very flexible in adapting to the new definition?
The flexibility of our brains and thoughts might be unique to humans, in both good and bad ways
>Not in all cases,
>If one chooses to abandon logical thinking, failure is inevitable
I have doubts about that idea
Firstly, construction is about the way of using metaphors and definitions, and it seems to me that your judgment is the one that has contaminated something
Furthermore, if, as you say, problems arise in constructing the logic, then will simply provide an improved version of the logic
And the very act of building that record can potentially reveal problems and identify new areas for improvement
Furthermore, it may lead to the generation of new logic
Isn't logic pursueable, and the point at which inference becomes impossible only when choose not to infer, or when define zero?
Evolution also involves flexibility
Doesn't that include ways of thinking as well?
> Let's go back
And isn't it logically constructive, or even effective, to continue the thought process and make progress and improvements from there?
Of course, this is assuming it's something good for the world
And isn't logic useful in investigating these things as well?
So, what did you want to gain from me?
Here, I've presented my thoughts on the importance and constructiveness of logical thinking
This is about situations where an illogical choice is made
Hmm,
Would it be easier to understand if I called it "constructing a condensed logical structure"?
Well, either way, if my definition of "constructing logic" is bothering you, then that's all
To put it in terms you can understand, you could define the logical structure or the constructed object as a story
And if the constructed logic is problematic, then all that's needed is to present a new logic
(This also includes examining the existing logic and presenting a better one)
This movement also touched upon true freedom, didn't it?
In that case, I believe that constructing and generating a better and more constructive new logic—that is, generating an aggregate of individual logic—is logically constructive
Stories that seem to exist or not already exist are appearing, and the logic behind them sometimes reflects that
(Wouldn't it be fair to define that as the realm of ideas?)
Furthermore, I am not constructing logic only for things that do not exist
Furthermore, I don't think it's true whether you're a programmer or not
Furthermore, can you definitively say that a situation where false facts exist, even if we don't know if they actually exist or not, doesn't exist?
And what's the problem when you construct a logical reasoning?
Yes, you're just saying it
Well, I'm just saying it too
They have already fabricated many false facts.
Furthermore, they have even generated narratives in the so-called realm of the soul
Cults that still exist today are a good example.
Now, I am simply saying that it would be effective to generate, construct, and record logic for one's own thoughts, experiences, and the conclusions drawn from them by revealing and improving these things