Anonymous ID: 788f65 March 16, 2026, 4:59 a.m. No.24386914   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6943 >>7053

>>24386857

>Oopsโ€”it seems I may have accidentally posted this in the wrong place

I have seen this text before in META if I recall correctly, so I say it showing up in General Research is not an accident

The stuff about deletions and censorship is done subtly, I'll give you props for that but I have no doubt your intentions towards this movement are not good

I'm off to get other things done today

Anonymous ID: 788f65 March 16, 2026, 5:25 a.m. No.24386982   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7004 >>7014 >>7029 >>7037

>>24386943

I am now an old man from a profession where men die young.

Military experience tells me you are not here in good faith, just as I tried to say when OSS started coming around and oldfags know what happened with him

I'm not going to debate, argue, nor sit and explain my position any further. I've seen your stuff before, and the alarms have gone off.

Anonymous ID: 788f65 March 16, 2026, 6:12 a.m. No.24387152   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>24387053

That's nice

Let's do the Reader's Digest version then:

I've seen your stuff before, and I mean the exact wording in parts

You come in quite polished so my instincts are you are some alphabet and your intentions are not good

My instincts have been right before