>>24391059

That's certainly a possibility, but they might also run away, or deliberately remain blind

If you were labeled a thief when you weren't, would you prove you weren't one?

Even if you prove you're not a thief, they might say, "Your behavior is suspicious, so you're a suspect"

Where did you learn that?

>>24391094

In that case, it's possible they're using that term intentionally

Perhaps such attributes are inherently present in the naming and definition itself

This might also be related to the use of symbols

This isn't about good or bad, affirmation or negation

>>24390350

Tyb

o7