TYB
On the Bibi question
no anonreally knows
but it's fun to speculate
what about the Bugs Bunny superman?
Discuss
anon saw what you did there
TY kindly anon
there is another drop which verbiage in original version.
https://qagg.news/?q=once+11.3+verifies&q2=
could be test
POTUS loves tests
draw out the sleepers
find out who's really MAGA
IDK
just speculating
POTUS talked of High IQ chess players he's up against
that's verifiable
anon could post the results but here's the jist of the responses.
Yes, history books do change as "moar archives" become available to historians.
The "agents" poopoo the idea of a "coordinated" narrative shift by secret or unknown hands.
All this obvious to anon
As to the "alarming" part Q referenced, nothing specific beyond the above.
It did reveal that the move towards the horrors of war aka, colonialism, racism, etc has become more of the focus of current books (aka wokeness)
anon has no hard copies of any History books to provide examples. The agents did prompt for this for deeper analysis.
Help much?
This:
The major U.S. immigration reform law of the 1960s was the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, often called the Hart–Celler Act.
Key facts
Signed into law: October 3, 1965
President: Lyndon B. Johnson
Purpose: To overhaul the U.S. immigration system and eliminate older quota rules.
What it changed
-
Ended national-origins quotas
Before 1965, U.S. immigration law strongly favored immigrants from Northern and Western Europe.
The new law abolished this discriminatory quota system that had been in place since the 1920s.
-
Created a preference system
Immigrants were prioritized based on:
Family reunification (relatives of U.S. citizens or residents)
Needed skills or professions
Refugee status
-
Set numerical limits
Introduced caps on immigration from the Eastern Hemisphere (and later the Western Hemisphere).
An anon asked for specifics. This is Grok, other AI "agents" post similar responses:
_____
The post you shared is two connected QAnon "drops" (#1956 and #1957) from August 28, 2018, on 8chan/qresearch. The first (1956) says: "It's always been out in the open.
You just have to LOOK.
You MUST stay TOGETHER.
TOGETHER YOU ARE STRONG.
Symbolism = END.
Q"
The reply (1957) adds the challenge: "Buy a history book published 20 years ago.
Buy a history book published 10 years ago.
Buy a history book published this year.
Compare.
Focus on WWI/WWII
Something ALARMING will be discovered.
Q"
No explicit questions are asked — this is a classic Q-style directive or riddle meant to prompt "anons" (followers) to do their own research and "wake up." It builds on the prior line that hidden truths are "out in the open" if you simply look, and it ties into recurring Q themes of unity ("stay TOGETHER"), symbolism as a key to understanding, and distrust of official narratives.The "questions posed concerning history books" are rhetorical/implied: What changes (if any) will you notice when comparing editions of WWI/WWII history books across ~20 years?
Why would those changes be "ALARMING"?
The intended "answer" or discovery Q wants readers to make is that the content, framing, emphasis, or omissions in sections about World War I and World War II have noticeably shifted or been revised between older (late-1990s/early-2000s) and newer (2018-era) publications. Q is suggesting this isn't natural academic progress but evidence of deliberate narrative control or rewriting by those in power — something "alarming" that proves history itself is manipulated, and the "truth" has been gradually sanitized or altered in modern textbooks and popular accounts. The drops encourage physical books (not online versions) because they can't be instantly edited, forcing readers to see the differences with their own eyes. This fits Q's broader pattern: "follow the money," question authority, and realize "it's all out in the open" once you compare sources yourself.In objective terms (independent of Q's framing):
History books and textbooks do evolve over time for legitimate reasons — new archives open, scholarship advances, societal priorities shift (e.g., more coverage of social/economic impacts, civilian experiences, or previously underrepresented perspectives), and interpretations are refined. Core facts about WWI (alliances, trench warfare, Treaty of Versailles) and WWII (rise of fascism, Holocaust, Pacific theater, Allied victory) remain consistent across reputable sources. Any "alarming" changes a reader spots would depend entirely on which specific books they pick and what they consider suspicious. Q's challenge is designed to lead followers toward seeing conspiracy where academics see normal historiographical progress.If you actually buy and compare a few standard high-school/college texts (e.g., older editions of books like The Guns of August or general U.S./world history surveys vs. recent ones), you'll likely notice shifts in tone, added context, or de-emphasis on certain angles — but that's standard in any field of study, not proof of a grand plot. The post's goal was to spark distrust in "official" history without spelling out the exact claim.
POTUS keeps enemies close until it's time to reveal the truth
IRAN is/was next to last
Soon that will be complete and on the final Act
Then, the last global piece will be revealed
As Israel will be exposed as part of Globohomo control
The puzzle will then be finished and the USA will hang all its traitors
Glorious
The plan is absolutelystableGenius.