i don't understand the supposed problem with this logic:
IF Q is legit, let POTUS expose the truth (they have everything any way)
IF Q is not legit, and we're being lied to, I (as a patriot) want to know about it.
i don't understand the supposed problem with this logic:
IF Q is legit, let POTUS expose the truth (they have everything any way)
IF Q is not legit, and we're being lied to, I (as a patriot) want to know about it.
which brings me back to my initial statement:
if Q is fake, then Q is illegal.
if Q is dangerous, then we (ok, I) should want exposure.
if Q is lying, then i want to know why.
fwiw, i believe but cannot prove that Q is legit.
i have found information that i never would have without Q hints, and have conversed with multiple reporters/journalists who were unaware of facts i brought to them…scoops, if you will.
but i can't prove that Q is legit and good.