>>2439743 <<prev.

>Can an Anon who's not tech challenged put these two side by side please. make it one meme. would be powerful.

hope you're still around, here's a version

>>2440230 <<prev.

<epic last post for a thread

>>2440303

hey, snopes, whuddup. it's a liddle more complicated than that.

but at least you're somewhat funny

>>2440350

Congrats, you got the reference

>>2440400

>>2440412

that's just some twatter, proves nothing

>>2440473 >>2440143 >>2440402 >>2440458

you make/bake us proud. thanks, bakers/bo

///

(can't believe they're sending in "larp" shills… phew. good luck with that)

…and just like that, normies who laughed every chance they got at "bumbling, uncredible" Spicer will find his word quite convincing, demonstrating yet another episode of cognitive dissonance

>>2440737

their only hope is fooling newfags (and filling space)

>>2440705

>>2440777

but since he loves the attention, best way to attack Wictor is just ignore him

>>2440820

>side question: what does "flood detected" mean when a post is discarded?

are you going to try posting a third time?

>>2440796

it means it's already there.

>>2440885

>>2440889

argh, he's among the very worst… that awful, so-bad-it's-not-even-a-meme nonmeme is burned in precious brain cells

>>2440970

>>2440975

what's with these redtexts catherding smurfs?

you may disagree but it's published