>>24407045

>winning winning winning

ya gonna need to explain that comment.

Winning what exactly? Playing for sand hills?

How many us-I troops need to head to ME to counter the ~1B faithful followers?

What is end game? us-I has oil, prob sand.

Does us-I think they can conquer the mid East? prob need to sort some elephant purchases out if wanna try, the ME has been at war for 1000's years (diff cultures/beliefs etc).

What makes the u-s-I system of trojan horse ownership the "rulers" of ME ?

Then again the us-I backed in an ally, now left holding the basketcase as is-RA-el is being flattened, since is-RA-el took first strike, & payback is a BTCH.

So clearly defing your version on "winning" 'cause all anon sees is us-I getting it's ass kicked all over the ME, and prob better off bugging out. Please explain.

>>24407131

>you're talking nonsense

I'm asking Q's.

Wanna answer?

If thinks Q's are "nonsensical", then YOU prob need to stay away from MSM & open eyes…

Iran has bunkers full of drones. They hold the central ground, they are firing missiles night & day, up to ~4000kms…

so answer the Q… what is Endgame for us-I? sandhills? conqure & hold? 100K or 200K us-I troops in a ground assult? thats gonna be killing fields.

Suggest tuck ya ego in back pocket for a minute, and read the writing on the wall. us-I got dragged into this conflict, MIC backing all the way, and vietnam is gonna look like a pussy fight. us-I are gonna get wipped out if try & take iran. imho.

Don't attack Q's, don't attack messenger, just answer the Q. WTF are us-I fighting for?

>>24407157

>doubt

The us-I is fighting for "doubt"…ok then.

In a MIL sense explain the us-I GAME plan in ME…seem there isn't one, just did a follow the leader, now us-I are "in", Q is how to get "out" imho.

>>24407175

>ou mean the Iran that wanted to build a nukes

oh please. Nutty has been on about iran gonna build nukes for years. thats msm propoganda.

Iran is enemy of central wankers.

fake state is-RA-el want war, MIC support it.

is-RA-el attacked iran FIRST, remember that.

so other than rest of world paying moar for fuels, are YOU suggesting the us-I are gonna "control" the ME? with yanky "freeeddddom", all ya biblical BS, ya yanky arrogance, from a 4% global village? really?

Not sure what they teach in yanky Mil colleges, but brainwashing is first thought.

So us-I blow up everything in ME, then what?

>>24407197

>Speak in plain English?

I AM.

Take the cotton wool outa ya ears.

What is us-I "endgame"?

Simple Q, even for you I hope. So answer it?

does us-I intend to "control" the midEast? How?

planning on convincing the whole area that us-I "freedoooms" & digID tattoos are the way to go? Not gonna happen imho.

>>24407232

>Bibi is alive

Got any proof of that?

So far missing shirt cuffs, teeth, extra fingers 7 ear holes, all Ai generated, based on old loc vids. So any proof of life?

>>24407246

>Guess who have no more missiles

is-RA-el ?