Removing wireless from your home (full video tutorial).

We will review step by step instructions on how to turn off 5g, ai, wi-fi, bluetooth, and other wireless technology. Additionally, we suggest swapping LEDS for incandescents and getting rid of smart meters.

https://odysee.com/@CultivateElevate:e2/removing5gandwifi:d

ArtIII.S2.C1.12.6 Torts Committed on Navigable Waters

Article III, Section 2, Clause 1:

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States;—between a State and Citizens of another State,—between Citizens of different States,—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

Maritime torts include injuries to persons,1 damages to property arising out of collisions or other negligent acts,2 product liability suits,3 and violent dispossession of property.4 Cases involving tort claims fall within admiralty jurisdiction when two requirements are met: (1) the commission or consummation of the act that gives rise to the claim occurs on navigable waters;5 and (2) the tort bears a significant relationship to traditional maritime activity.6

The first requirement for admiralty jurisdiction, which is based on the location of the incident, is satisfied if the tort arises on the high seas or on other navigable waters of the United States.7 Prior to Congress’s enactment of the Extension of Admiralty Jurisdiction Act of 1948, the Supreme Court had held that some claims arising from injury or damage to property caused by a vessel on navigable waters did not fall within admiralty jurisdiction when they were consummated on land (e.g., collision of a ship with a bridge).8 In the Extension Act,9 Congress enlarged admiralty jurisdiction to encompass many of these claims. The Court implicitly upheld that expansion of admiralty jurisdiction as within constitutional limits10 when determining that the jurisdiction ecompassed a tort that arose when a longshoreman slipped on loose beans that spilled from negligently packed cargo on a dock during a vessel’s unloading.11 In addition to Congress’s expansion of admiralty jurisdiction, the Court has maintained a few historical exceptions to a strict situs test for maritime jurisdiction.12 However, even with such congressional and judicial guidance, it may occasionally be difficult to distinguish maritime torts from land-based torts. For example, the Court held that admiralty jurisdiction did not extend to an injury caused by defective pier-based equipment that a dock worker suffered when unloading a vessel; thus, the worker had to resort to state law for a remedy.13

The Supreme Court’s jurisprudence on the second factor, which asks whether the tort bears a significant relationship to a traditional maritime activity, may also raise complex interpretive questions. For example, in Executive Jet Aviation v. City of Cleveland, a jet aircraft departing a Cleveland airport collided with seagulls, crashed, and sank into the navigable state territorial waters of Lake Erie.14 The owners of the aircraft sued a federal air traffic controller and others for negligence, seeking to invoke the admiralty jurisdiction of the federal courts.15 The Court held that, in addition to establishing that the commission or consummation of the wrongful act took place on navigable waters,16 the plaintiffs had to show that the tort bore a significant relationship to traditional maritime activity.17 Because a land-based aircraft’s flight between two locations within the United States’s continental boundaries did not possess such a relationship, the Court held that federal courts could not exercise admiralty jurisdiction.18 However, the Court’s opinion in Executive Jet suggests that Congress may have some flexibility to expand admiralty jurisdiction to encompass claims like those at issue in the case by enacting laws that, for example, enlarge the concept of a traditional maritime activity.19

In other cases, the Supreme Court has determined that admiralty jurisdiction exists because a case involves a traditional maritime activity. For example, the Court upheld the exercise of admiralty jursidiction over a collision between two private pleasure boats on navigable waters—even though pleasure boating was not exclusively a commercial activity—because such a collision could impact maritime commerce.20 For similar reasons, the Court held that a dredging company’s vessel was engaged in a traditional maritime activity when it damaged an underwater freight tunnel while performing maintenance work.21

@NoticerNews

A paedophile from a prominent ultra-orthodox Jewish family has been spared jail for raping a young boy in a Melbourne synagogue.

Zev Serebryanski, 62, was found guilty by a jury in December of abusing Manny Waks, the brother of journalist Avi Yemini.

https://www.noticer.news/zev-velvel-serebryanski-avoids-jail-melbourne/

@ArchetypeTheory

Do you know what the longest running Human experiment is?

For 2,500–3,000 years, Jews and Muslims have circumcised every baby boy without anesthesia, as a ritual blood covenant.

This is the longest human selective-breeding experiment ever conducted.

The cut traumatizes the infant, rewiring the brain for high stress, poor bonding, and altered behavior. These changes are epigenetically passed down through generations, compounding damage, most likely irreversible.

After centuries, it creates distinct male patterns:

Jewish side: Mutilated early, leads to indirect power through words, money, and networks. Risk-averse, verbal, subversive—coded as "feminine" in warrior terms. Focus on guilt, reputation, matrilineal control.

Muslim side: Mutilated later, leads to overcompensation with dominance, violence, and possession. Brittle, explosive, honor-bound—hyper-masculine. Focus on physical control, polygamy, veiling.

Same brain damage, different environments: Diaspora for Jews (survive via cunning), conquest for Muslims (survive via force).

This fuels Jewish supremacy in the West (subversion via finance, media) and Islamic invasion (aggression, unassimilation).

The West was social engineered by Jews to normalize circumcusion, neutralizing resistance and turned it into a billion dollar precious tissue harvesting operation.

Solution: Ban non-medical infant male circumcision entirely—no exceptions. This stops inducting Western boys, and reactivates cultural defenses and the Western moral superiority.

Next question… Could banning circumcusion be the solution to saving the West from middle eastern demographics terrorizing the world with their turf wars?

https://twitter.com/ArchetypeTheory/status/2029570936240800150?s=20