Anonymous ID: 32bc00 March 21, 2026, 11:40 p.m. No.24411452   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1456 >>1458 >>1504 >>1506

Here's my current take…not that anyone cares.

Trump was never president, at least in the sense that we think. Instead, the military takeover was done on election night of 2016 and through the end of the Obama presidency…if not years before at some point during the Obama presidency (think timing on Newsweek's 60k citizen army). Long planned but unsurfaced publicly until Trump. Trump was brought on to be a number of things. Pose a president, be the lead negotiator to renegotiate the world order, be a whipping boy, and just generally take over/counter all other narratives in the information war. The 5th generation war is out in the public, but where actually fighting it with 6th generation war tactics and weapons also. I tend to think little of this will ever be disclosed. We are writing a "truthful" version of history that has to have staying power. Conspiracy theories can be contained at the margin, but "the truth to know will be yours." The greater public will never know nor do they care or need to know. This and especially the dark stuff just goes to the grave. Think of the anecdotes about Babylon, Canaan, or the Aztecs. We know the general gist of what was going on, but we don't have the day to day coverage. Few experts even dig in far enough to know more details. While we have more sources that posterity can lean on in the future, the people in the future will think of these times like we do of ancient civilizations: an ugly footnote in human history. Future and current people must have hope and be focused on making their future better, from which we'll get the emergent goodness we're seeking. The dirty work to know and even address the evil in our midst will be done quietly and in the shadows, so get used to never being able to say "I told you so." This is just a dirty part of the job: "it had to be this way…"

Anonymous ID: 32bc00 March 21, 2026, 11:48 p.m. No.24411462   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1466

>>24411458

>Ask yourself this; How Good Can It Be?

It already is. The ugly stuff is mostly all done. It's really more of not being able to tell people 80% but still needing to get them to change course. A tall order and one best done over time for minimum collateral damage. That said, to be specific, I'm focused recently on the idea that it's not about voting or not voting but of actually cancelling the elections altogether…aka, leaving behind the false binary.

Anonymous ID: 32bc00 March 22, 2026, 12:15 a.m. No.24411493   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24411466

>We Don't Need Reps In Congress….

 

>We have the tech to vote on issues ourselves. We don't need them to travel to DC and get bribed, or blackmailed.

 

If this were a democracy, then sure, but there's a small problem: we're a republic. #1 because democracy allows idiots to wield too much power and its corollary #2 to keep up with a lot of the issues that government deals with needs focused attention, e.g. specialists (not lawyers), which takes away from the economy. Sure, if the federal government were much smaller and simpler, some of what you suggest seems intelligent. I just don't think you've thought through your suggestion.

 

If you're speaking in good faith, I'd agree that massive decentralization is the solution. Following successful patterns of biomimicry is a good idea. Just ask yourself what could go wrong with direct democracy first…

I don't have the solution, but I kind of think that all past governmental models are broken. Our public is pretty retarded, so I'd probably hand over a lot of tasks to AI before I let some porch monkeys start voting for more EBT money.