Anonymous ID: 2cc224 March 22, 2026, 8:03 p.m. No.24415357   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5361 >>5610 >>5670 >>5677

Conservatives Rally in Budapest To Challenge Brussels Power Grab

 

CPAC Hungary highlighted a shift from rhetoric to strategy, as conservative figures moved toward coordinated political action across borders.

Javier Villamor

— March 21, 2026

 

The afternoon session of CPAC Hungary made one thing clear:the Budapest gathering is no longer just a meeting of like-minded conservatives, but an emerging coordination hub for partiespreparing to challenge Brussels in an increasingly tense European political climate.

 

Speaker after speaker delivered the same blunt message: power in the European Union is shifting away from nation-states and into central institutions, with growing consequences for sovereignty, energy policy, and democratic control.

 

Immigration, censorship, energy, and the war in Ukraine were framed not as separate issues, but as fronts in a single political struggle shaping Europe’s future.Hungary was repeatedly presented as proof that resisting that trajectory remains possible.

 

“In Hungary, much more than Hungary’s sovereignty is at stake,” warned Santiago Abascal, whodescribed the country as “the most important bastion in defense of European identity and Western civilization.”

 

The VOX leader argued thatthe Budapest meeting showed an international alliance already taking shape—one uniting European parties, American figures, and governments around a shared political vision. He said European politics can no longer be understood at the national level alone, criticising the Spanish government for placing the country “on the opposite side of the Western world.”

 

“We believe we must redouble our efforts with our patriotic allies,” Abascal said, presentinggatherings like CPAC as evidence that an organised alternative is emerging.

 

That shift beyond traditional Left-Right divisions was echoed across the session. Vlaams Belang president Tom Van Grieken framed the central question as who decides a nation’s future: its citizens or European institutions.

 

Dutch leader Geert Wilders struck a similar tone, warning that Europe faces “mass immigration, woke ideology and Euro-federalism,” and arguing that his generation must defend “our nations, our families and our civilization” against policies imposed without public backing.

 

Several speakers also criticised new EU rules on online content, warning that measures such as the Digital Services Act risk restricting political debate.They linked free speech directly to sovereignty, arguing that decisions made in Brussels are increasingly shaping domestic political life.

 

Hungary remained central to that argument.Balázs Orbán, adviser to the prime minister, said the Hungarian model shows it is possible to defend national interestswithin the EU without accepting deeper integration.The real problem, he argued, is not Europe itself, but a system in which central authorities override national decision-making.

 

Alice Weidel also focused on the nation-state as the foundation of political freedom. She accused European elites of using immigration, climate policy, and economic regulation to expand their power, and said rising support for patriotic parties reflects growing public resistance to the EU’s direction.

 

One of the mostanticipated interventions came from Argentine president Javier Milei, who framed current politics as part of a broader ideological struggle. He argued that the conflict is not only economic but cultural, and that the rise ofconservative movements reflects a backlash against decades of collectivist policies.

 

Events such as CPAC, Milei said, help sustain an international network built around the “ideas of freedom,” extending from domestic policy to foreign affairs.

 

Despite national differences, the message across the session was strikingly consistent:Western politics is entering a phase of realignment, and conservative parties must coordinate if they want to shape decisions in Brussels, national capitals, and the European Parliament.

 

What emerged in Budapest was not a formal alliance, but something close—a loose but increasingly self-aware bloc of sovereignist forces, now moving beyond shared rhetoric toward coordinated political action.

 

https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news/conservatives-rally-in-budapest-to-challenge-brussels-power-grab/

Anonymous ID: 2cc224 March 22, 2026, 8:18 p.m. No.24415376   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5381 >>5387 >>5610 >>5670 >>5677

Fulton County Numbers Don’t Match After FBI Seizure. 1/2

Officials from Fulton County, Georgia, wanted to quash a subpoena from the Georgia State Board of Elections because providing “approximately 750 boxes” of material would be too burdensome.

Yet, when the FBI came knocking in a Jan. 28 raid, federal agents left with 656 boxes (653 by one count), prompting a top Georgia election official to wonder about the gap in the number.

 

“That’s almost 100 boxes of evidence,” Janice Johnston, vice chair of the Georgia State Election Board, told The Daily Signal.

 

She referenced one county affidavit that only estimated “over 700 boxes” at the county elections hub. She said, “Even 50 [extra] boxes would be a lot of evidence.”

 

In a post on X, Johnston posed the questions, “WHERE ARE 100 BOXES OF ELECTION DOCUMENTS?!! … WHO HAS THE BOXES?!!”

 

A rough estimate does not excuse such a large numerical disparity in an affidavit or court filings, Johnston said.

 

The State Election Board has since made a records request to the Fulton County Board of Elections to provide information about materials delivered or removed from storage in the four weeks preceding the FBI raid.

 

“Fulton County is effectively the person of interest in this case,” Johnston said. “We are not assured that everything was available.”

 

The FBI seized materials from the 2020 election that included ballots, tabulator tapes, and ballot images from a recount, Georgia Public Broadcasting reported, citing court documents that supported the search warrant. About 370,000 ballot images are missing, Johnston noted.

 

After the raid, Fulton County sued the Justice Department, calling for a return of the documents. The lawsuit also asked the court to prevent the FBI from reviewing the documents.

 

Johnston called the lawsuit “over the top.”

 

“They have been fighting the State Elections Board over the same documents,” Johnston said.

 

The Daily Signal sought comment from Fulton County Board of Elections Chairwoman Sherri Allen and Elections Director Nadine Williams. A Fulton County spokesperson responded to the inquiry.

 

“Fulton County complied fully with the search warrant executed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation on January 28, 2026, seeking records related to the 2020 Election,” Fulton County spokeswoman Jessica Corbitt told The Daily Signal in an email.

 

“Agents spent more than 8 hours at the Fulton County Elections Hub and Operations Center and had the opportunity to review all files related to the 2020 Election,” Corbitt continued. “Agents were made aware of all 2020 documents and selected the files that they removed from the premises. This is now a matter that is being handled by the courts.”

 

An FBI spokesperson declined to comment on this story.

 

 

https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/03/19/who-has-the-boxes-fulton-county-estimates-on-2020-evidence-before-and-after-fbi-

Anonymous ID: 2cc224 March 22, 2026, 8:20 p.m. No.24415381   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5610 >>5670 >>5677

>>24415376

2/2

Fulton County, in a court filing in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, said 656 boxes were taken.

 

“The United States executed the Warrant later that day, seizing and removing approximately 656 boxes containing the original versions of 2020 election-related materials from the Fulton County Clerk of Superior Court,” the complaint filed on Feb. 5 says.

 

“Robert L. ‘Robb’ Pitts, Chairman of the Fulton County Board of Commissioners, and the Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections respectfully request the return of all original seized materials and an order instructing the Respondent to maintain, but not review, any copies of the seized materials until this matter is resolved.”

 

That estimate of 656 boxes was smaller than a figure given in a petition to quash a November 2024 subpoena. That petition asserted that it would be an “unreasonable and oppressive substantive burden” to produce records on the 2020 election.

 

“The substantive request in the subpoenas would require a review of all materials retained from the 2020 election, which have been archived in approximately 750 boxes,” wrote Michael Tyler, a lawyer representing the county, in the Nov. 15, 2024, petition. “Petitioners estimate temporary staff of approximately 20 full-time people will need to be retained to review the documents.”

 

Then, on Feb. 4, 2025, Williams, the election director, provided a sworn affidavit and reduced the estimate for both boxes and staff time from the November response.

 

“Fulton County’s 2020 election materials are stored in over 700 boxes, each of which must be opened, searched, and sorted systematically to locate the majority of the documents requested in the subpoenas,” Williams said in the affidavit.

 

“The DRE [Department of Registration and Elections] does not have sufficient staff to conduct this search and make copies of the documents requested,” Williams added. “I estimate that we would need to hire 15 temporary staff members to work full time (40 hours a week), at approximately $26/hour, for a period of approximately 15 weeks to conduct the searching and copying necessary to comply with the subpoena.”

 

https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/03/19/who-has-the-boxes-fulton-county-estimates-on-2020-evidence-before-and-after-fbi-raid/