Incorrect decoding.
Not the person.
Think connection.
Threat 1
Threat 2
1 = past (newspaper)
2 = future (rally)
1=2
Post noted (VIP access).
Message sent.
We know.
Q
A newspaper (actual/online/comments?) was used (past) to signal a threat that was to occur (future) at the rally.
The domestic cabal knows they are under full surveillance therefore they are using public/hidden modes of communication.
Tradecraft in action.
Similarly, Peter Strzok might have agreed to 'testify' so that he could pass messages to his cohorts.
I cannot say that Kate on the bottle was in direct connection to today's suggestion but I would not put it past them.
Q,
Do you have the key that unlocks these secret orders/transmissions?