(==ISRAEL AND BIBI ARE SUPER PISSED THEY WEREN’T INVOLVED OR GAVE THERE INPUT. KEK)

(1/3)

US EXPECTED TO SEND THOUSANDS MORE TROOPS TO MIDEAST

Trump says talks with Iran progressing, as Israel said to fear premature ceasefire

Official confirms to ToI that Washington sent Tehran 15 conditions for a deal; summit could reportedly take place in Pakistan within days; US president says regime gave US ‘very big present’

March 24, 2026

US President Donald Trump claimed Tuesday that his administration was “talking to the right people” in Iran, adding that the Islamic Republic “wants to make a deal so badly” to end the ongoing war.

“We’re in negotiations right now… We have a number of people doing it,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office, referring to his negotiators Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, along with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance.

Despite the talk of diplomacy, the Pentagon is expected to send thousands of troopsfrom the elite 82nd Airborne Division to the Middle East, two people familiar with the matter told Reuters.

The officials,speaking on the condition of anonymity, did not specify where in the Middle East the troops would be sent or when they would arrive in the region.

Israel’s Channel 12 news reported Tuesday that the Trump administration has conveyed 15 conditions to Iran as its terms for ending the current war,which an Israeli official familiar with the matter later confirmed the details of to The Times of Israel, while expressing skepticism that Iran will agree to such a framework. Theofficial also confirmed that Washington informed Jerusalem ahead of its negotiations with Tehranon ending hostilities, which began on Sunday,without specifying how far ahead of time.

The conditions appeared to cover all of the United States’ and Israel’s war goals, the TV report indicated.

Nonetheless, it said,Jerusalem is concerned that Trump and his team want to push quickly for “a framework agreement, an agreement in principle” with Iran, ==rather than insisting on these demands as a condition for halting the war. It

The report, Written citing three sources familiar with the details, said Kushner and Witkoff have drawn up a mechanism involving “the declaration of a monthlong ceasefire period, during which the sides would negotiate a 15-point agreement.”==

Theframework is reminiscentof previous Trump administration-brokered agreements with Hamas in Gaza and with Lebanon.(which Israel hates)

“The scenario of a rapid, ambiguous agreement in principle is giving Israel’s political and security leaders sleepless nights,” Channel 12 reported, because it risks a situation in which the Iranians would essentially have emerged with the upper hand, with the conflict ending before the precise terms are agreed.

(https://www.timesofisrael.com/trump-says-talks-with-iran-progressing-as-israel-said-to-fear-premature-ceasefire/

Notice how many people in US and perhaps military talking to Israel and Mossad that disagree with Trump. And can you feel the poison leaking through their words in the article?

>>24423524

(2/3)

The report specified 14 of the 15 demands and benefits that the US has conveyed to Iran as follows, citing a Western source:

US demands of Iran:

1. Iran must dismantle its existing nuclear capabilities.

1. Iran must commit never to pursue nuclear weapons.

1. There will be no uranium enrichment on Iranian territory.

1. Iran must hand its stockpile of some 450 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 percent to the International Atomic Energy Agency in the near future, in a timetable to be agreed.

1. The Natanz, Isfahan and Fordo nuclear facilities must be dismantled.

1. The IAEA, the UN’s nuclear watchdog, must be granted full access, transparency and oversight inside Iran.

1. Iran must abandon its regional proxy “paradigm.”

1. Iran must cease the funding, direction and arming of its regional proxies.

1. The Strait of Hormuz must remain open and function as a free maritime corridor.

1. Iran’s missile program must be limited in both range and quantity, with specific thresholds to be determined at a later stage.

1. Any future use of missiles would be restricted to self-defense.

In return, Iran would benefit as follows:

12.Iran would receive a full lifting of sanctions imposed by the international community.

13.The US would assist Iran in advancing its civilian nuclear program, including electricity generation at the Bushehr nuclear plant.

14.The so-called “snapback” mechanism, which allows for theautomatic reimposition of sanctionsif Iran fails to comply,would be removed.

The Haaretz daily, citing a source in the Middle East, said the US had passed along its 15-point proposal to Iran through Pakistan,with a 24-hour deadline for the Islamic Republic to respond.

Tehran said it would be unable to meet the deadlinebecause decision-makers in the regime were having such difficulty communicating or meeting for fear of being targeted, the report said.

Iran ultimately told the US it would consider the offer,but emphasized there were some things it would never accept, according to the report.

Trump said Monday there were many points of agreement with Iran on terms for ending the war, and a serious chance for a deal.However, Israeli intelligence has estimated that the gaps between the sides are very large, according to Channel 12.

Iran’s new supreme leader must approve talks – report

The US — together with mediators Pakistan, Egypt and Turkey —is discussing holding a “peace summit” with Iran as early as Thursday, where the sides would discuss the US’s proposal, the network reported, citing three sources familiar with the plan.

The summit would likely be held in Islamabad, the report said, although it added that two sources noted Iran had not yet agreed to such a summit.

Pakistan’s prime minister said earlier he was willing to host talks between the US and Iran on ending the war. A Pakistani government source saiddiscussions on a meeting were at an advanced stage and if it did happen — “a big ‘if'” — it would take place within a week.

It is unclear at what level the talks would take place, the TV report said. While theUS was said to prefer a high-level meeting— such asbetween Vance and IranianParliament Speaker Mohammad BagherGhalibaf — itcould also be held at a lower level, such as between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and Kushner and Witkoff.

Regardless of Washington’s negotiations with Iran, US and Israeli officials told Channel 12that they did not see the war ending or even pausing in the next two to three weeks, as reaching a deal is expected to take longer.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/trump-says-talks-with-iran-progressing-as-israel-said-to-fear-premature-ceasefire/

>>24423527

(3/3)

Iran has denied engaging in talks with the US, and officials familiar with the matter have clarified that what has taken place in recent days has been more of a passing along of messages through mediators.

Trump:Iran gave US ‘present’ related to Strait of Hormuz

In the Oval Office, Trump reiterated that he had been planning to bomb Iran’s main power plant until Tehran purportedly reached out over the weekend, expressing interest in negotiating a deal to end the war.

The president said he was demanding in talks that Iran not be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon and insisted that Tehran had already agreed to that. Iran has long said it’s not pursuing a nuclear weapon, but has been enriching uranium at weapons-grade levels.

He went on to say that Iran had given him a “present” worth a “tremendous amount of money” related to the Strait of Hormuz and matters of oil and gas.

Asked by reporters why he trusts the Iranians, Trump first insisted that he doesn’t trust anyone before adding, “They did something yesterday that was amazing — they gave us a present… that arrived today.”

“It was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money,and I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize,”he said.

“They gave it to us, and they said they were going to give it.That meant one thing to me.[That we’re] dealing with the right people… They’re the only ones [who] could have done it,” Trump continued.

“It wasn’t nuclear related, it was oil and gas related,” he added when pressed to clarify the nature of the gift.

Asked if the gift was related to the flow in the Strait of Hormuz, Trump responded, “Yeah.” Asked if the US would control Hormuz after the war, Trump said, “We’ll have control of anything we want.”

“I think we’re going to end [the war],” he added.

Trump quipped that when he told his defense secretary and military chief that he thought the Iran war would be settled soon,the latter two were upset because they wanted to keep fighting.

Times of Israel staff contributed to this report.

(https://www.timesofisrael.com/trump-says-talks-with-iran-progressing-as-israel-said-to-fear-premature-ceasefire/

The Rolling Stones - You Can’t Always Get What You Want(Official Lyric Video)

7:30

https://youtu.be/krxU5Y9lCS8

Justices seem ready to overturn state law allowing for late-arriving mail-in ballots.

By Amy Howe on Mar 23, 2026

(She never guess’s so might be solid)

(1/2)

The Supreme Court on Monday appeared ready to overturn a Mississippi law that allows mail-in ballots to be counted as long as they are postmarked by, and then received within five business days of, Election Day. After just over two hours of oral argument in Watson v. Republican National Committee, a majority of justices seemed to agree with the challengers – which included the Republican Party of Mississippi and the Libertarian Party of Mississippi – that the Mississippi law conflicts with federal laws that set the Tuesday after the first Monday in November as the “election day.”

Because more than a dozen states have similar laws, the court’s ruling – which is expected by late June or early July – could have significant implications for federal elections, beginning as soon as November.

Mississippi passed the law at the center of the case in 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Four years later, the Republican National Committee, the Mississippi Republican Party, a Mississippi voter, and a county election official went to court to challenge the law, as did the Libertarian Party of Mississippi in a separate lawsuit (which was later combined with the Republicans’ lawsuit). They argued that Mississippi’s law clashed with a federal law, enacted by Congress in 1845, that establishes the Tuesday after the first Monday in November as “election day.” In 1872, Congress directed that congressional elections should occur on this day, as well.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit agreed with the challengers that federal law requires all ballots to be received by Election Day. After the full court of appeals – over a dissent by five judges – rejected the state’s petition to rehear the case, the state went to the Supreme Court, which agreed in November to weigh in.

At Monday’s oral argument, Mississippi Solicitor General Scott Stewart told the justices that states have broad power over elections. Laws like Mississippi’s, he argued, are consistent with federal election laws because voters make their final choices by Election Day.

Paul Clement, representing the challengers, countered that when Congress initially passed the law establishing the Tuesday after the first Monday in November as “Election Day,” the casting of ballots and the state’s receipt of ballots were “so inextricably intertwined” that “no one would have thought of one without the other” – supporting his argument that a ballot is final (and the election therefore occurs) when it is received by election officials.

U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued on behalf of the Trump administration, which filed a “friend of the court” brief supporting the challengers.Sauer told the court that “Mississippi’s theory of election is so general and permissive that it would authorize statutes that Congress could not possibly have approved in the 19th century.”

Several justices focused on the history of election practices and what it might mean for Congress’ understanding of “Election Day” when it enacted the laws at the center of this case. Clement emphasized the “unbroken historical tradition” for much of the 19th century and early 20th century of requiring ballots to be received (normally through in-person voting) on Election Day.

But the lawyers and justices sparred over the significance of departures from that tradition during the Civil War, when some Union states allowed soldiers to vote from the battlefields. Clement insisted that proxy voting was the most analogous to today’s absentee ballots. Five states, he said, still required ballots to be submitted and received in a soldier’s home state by Election Day. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, one of the justices who was most sympathetic to Mississippi, responded that two states had allowed officers to collect and mail-in ballots for soldiers.

HTTPS://WWW.SCOTUSBLOG.COM/2026/03/COURT-APPEARS-READY-TO-OVERTURN-STATE-LAW-ALLOWING-FOR-LATE-ARRIVING-MAIL-IN-BALLOTS/

>>24423628

Time to Celebrate

(2/2)

Justice Neil Gorsuch, who appeared considerably less sympathetic to Mississippi, expressed concern that voters could recall or revoke their votes before they were actually counted, so that their final choices would not occur before Election Day.Gorsuch asked Stewart to address a hypothetical scenario in which, after Election Day but before a winner is declared, a candidate is revealed to have been colluding with a foreign power. As a result, Gorsuch posited, some absentee voters could recall their mail-in ballots and switch their votes, changing the outcome of the election.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson pushed back, emphasizing that in her view the case was not about either ballot recalls or what the history of election practices might have been. Instead, she stressed, the dispute before the justices was over who decides the date by which ballots must be received, and, in particular, whether Congress has prohibited the states from making those decisions. “We’re trying … to figure out,” she said, “what Congress meant when it included Election Day in its federal statutes.”

Justice Samuel Alito suggested that in defending the law, Mississippi faced “a variety of line-drawing problems” –the idea that the state’s position, if taken to its logical conclusion, could lead to extreme and (at least in Alito’s view) undesirable outcomes. For example, he asked Stewart, how long after Election Day can states count ballots?

Stewart’s answer – that states get to make the initial decision, but Congress can always step in to impose limits – proved unsatisfying to Alito.

But Jackson once again pushed back, telling Alito that line-drawing problems “are only problems to the extent that Congress thought they were problems.” The question before the court, she noted, is whether Congress intended to “cabin” the states’ decisions regarding Election Day. And indeed, she said, several federal laws – such as those governing voting for military and overseas voters – indicate that Congress intended to incorporate state laws establishing post-election ballot-receipt deadlines into federal law.

Jackson later noted that Congress is currently considering a bill that would prohibit states from counting ballots received after Election Day. The fact that it believes such legislation is necessary, she posited, indicates that Congress believes that federal law currently permits laws like Mississippi’s.

Justice Elena Kagan echoed Jackson’s thinking. She observed that a 2022 law intended to clarify the process for casting and counting of presidential electors, the Electoral Count Reform Act, specifically refers to “the period of voting.” The use of that phrase, she told Clement, implied that Congress is “fine” with states having a “period” for voting, rather than a single day.

Clement answered that the phrase “period of voting” was intended to refer to early voting. But that answer seemed to create some difficulty for the challengers, as various justices pressed both Sauer and Clement about why, under their position, the statute would allow early voting (which was also not used in early U.S. history) but preclude ballots received after Election Day.

Clement told the court that early voting does not “vitiate the whole idea of an Election Day” in the same way that counting ballots received after Election Day does. And in particular, he emphasized, it does not raise the same concerns about fraud – which were at the core of Congress’ motives in passing the law at the center of the case in the first place.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh had a practical question for Clement. If the court were to rule for the challengers in a decision issued in June, Kavanaugh queried, would it be too late to implement that decision for the 2026 elections?

Clement responded that it would not be. Under federal law, he noted, absentee ballots must go out to military and overseas voters 45 days before the general election in November – which would mean that states would have to mail them in mid-September.

As Kavanaugh’s question suggests, a decision in the case is expected by late June or early July.

HTTPS://WWW.SCOTUSBLOG.COM/2026/03/COURT-APPEARS-READY-TO-OVERTURN-STATE-LAW-ALLOWING-FOR-LATE-ARRIVING-MAIL-IN-BALLOTS/

Jake Sherman

@JakeSherman

🚨BREAKING NEWS in PM:

JUSTICE DEPARTMENT requested HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE send them classified interview transcripts relating to JOHN BRENNAN, the former CIA director.

INTEL is voting on it right now.

This shows DOJ is actively pursuing an investigation/case against BRENNAN

From punchbowl.news

5:55 PM · Mar 24, 2026

·442.7K Views

https://x.com/JakeSherman/status/2036562675153371213?s=20

Iran refuses peace talks with Trump’s ‘backstabbing’ negotiators

Connor Stringer

Tue, March 24, 2026 at 5:36 PM EDT

(1/3)

Iran has refused to negotiate with Donald Trump’s top envoys, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, accusing them of “backstabbing”.

Gulf sources told The Telegraph thatthe Iranians would not sit down with Mr Witkoff, the administration’s Middle East envoy, and Mr Kushner, Mr Trump’s adviser and son-in-law,because of the military strikes that hit Tehran hours after they held talks in February.

JD Vance, the vice-president who has remained largely quiet during the conflict, is now being touted as chief negotiator should fresh discussions go ahead in Islamabad, Pakistan, later this week.

“Vance is preferred,”a Gulf source said of the Iranians. “They don’t want to work with Jared and Witkoff because they stabbed them in the back.”

A second Gulf source said the Iraniansbelieved Mr Vance would stick to his wordand that his participationis seen as the appropriate seniority for negotiationswith Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the parliament speaker.

Mr Vance is widely viewed as a sceptic of the US president’s “Operation Epic Fury”.

The Americanvice-president’s possible role as leader of a new US negotiating team signalsthe White House’s intent to head off further economic pain and de-escalate,even though the strategy for ending the war remains unclear.

Speaking in the Oval Office on Tuesday evening, Mr Trump saidMr Vance was among “several people” taking part in negotiations. “They’re [Witkoff and Kushner] doing it, along with Marco, JD,we have a number of people doing it,”he said.

One diplomatic source said Tehran had lost trust in Washington’s delegation and was sceptical of Mr Kushner and Mr Witkoff’s seriousness about ending the conflict.

The US launched strikes on the Iranian capital killing Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, two days after wrapping up negotiations in Geneva.

Several Gulf states had left those talks convinced a deal to avoid a full-blown conflict was possible.

While Islamabad is yet to be confirmed as the venue for negotiations, Shehbaz Sharif, the Pakistani prime minister, said on Tuesday that the country was “ready and honoured” to host negotiations to end the war.

Talks between the US and Iran have been indirect so far, relying on intermediaries. Despite this, Mr Trump claimed on Monday that regime change had already been achieved.

“We have, really, regime change. This is achange in the regime, because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with that created all those problems,” he said.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/iran-refuses-peace-talks-trump-173711706.html

>>24423852

(2/3)

He also claimed the US had won, telling reporters:“The war has been won. The only one that likes to keep it going is the fake news.”

Mr Trump also claimed to have received a gift from Iran’s leadership, saying: “They gave us a present and the present arrived today. And it was a very big present, worth a tremendous amount of money.”

Egypt, Pakistan and Turkey have passed messages between the US and Iran as rising energy pricesand the collateral effects on markets and business from the war hit home.

Theforeign ministers of the three countriesreportedlyheld separate talks with Mr Witkoff and Abbas Araghchi, Iran’s foreign minister.

Mr Vanceis also said to havespoken with Benjamin Netanyahu – who remains adamant that Israel should continue bombing Iran– and discussed components needed to end the war.

Mr Trump dispatched Mr Witkoff and Mr Kushner to Geneva to hold what would be the last round of negotiations with Iran before the US president decided to launch his military campaign on Feb 28.

Their aims were threefold: Iran could not have a nuclear weapon, meaning its Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear sites had to be closed, its terrorist proxies shut down, and ballistic missile production curbed.

Thenegotiations broke down when Tehran handed over a seven-page agreement– described by US officials asbeing so full of holes it was akin to “Swiss cheese” – to Mr Witkoff and Mr Kushner on the last day of talks on Feb 26.

With the war in its fourth week,Gulf states, including Saudi Arabia, continue to weigh joining the conflict, angered at Tehran’s strikes on their territory.

Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), the Saudi crown prince, reportedly urged Mr Trump to press on with the war, describing the conflict as a “historic opportunity” to remake the region.

In aseriesof phone calls,MBS urged the president to press for the destruction of Iran’s hardline government, arguing that it posed along-term threatto the Gulf, according to the New York Times.

The talks coincide with Mr Trump’s about turn on a 48-hour deadline he had imposed on Iran toreopen the Strait of Hormuz, the vital sea passage for oil shipments that has been blocked since the start of the war.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/iran-refuses-peace-talks-trump-173711706.html

>>24423859

(3/3)

In a move which reassured markets,Mr Trump on Monday said he would call off strikes for five dayswhile peace talks took place, prompting the FTSE 100 to swing into the green and Brent crude to fall by 14 per cent to $96 (£76) a barrel.

Claiming that the US had held “very strong talks” with Iran, Mr Trump suggestedAmerica would “jointly control” the key oil routeand promised there would be a “very serious form of regime change” in the Islamic Republic.

It was unclear whether Mr Trump was suggesting he would have a direct handin Tehran’s governance,or who the new Iranian leader could be,. as well as what role,if any, the Gulf states would playin the country after the war.

Iran denied any such talks had taken place.KEK

“These are sensitive diplomatic discussions and the US will not negotiate through the press. This is a fluid situation, and speculation about meetings should not be deemed final until they are formally announced by the White House,” Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/iran-refuses-peace-talks-trump-173711706.html

Bibi and Israel are really pissed Trump said the war is over, he obviously planned to drag this out to kill as many and more people they wanted to get. Some not related to Iran. I’m sure Trump knew Bibi would not stop killing.

California University Cancels Governor Debate Over ‘Blowback’ for Candidates Being All White

Sean James

Mar 24th, 2026, 5:54

All white is not alright, apparently.

The University of Southern California abruptly canceled its planned gubernatorial debate that was set for Tuesday night after the college was criticized for all six candidates being white.

That led to “outrage” and “blowback” against USCand compelled the school to scrap the debate less than 24 hours before it started, according to The New York Times.

“Some Democratic lawmakers claim the formula the school used to determine who could participate was biased,” the report said. “They had called on voters to boycott the debate if the university did not invite the excluded candidates.”

KTLA 5 in Los Angeles reported:

The Democrats who were set to participate —Rep. Eric Swalwellof Dublin, former Orange CountyRep. Katie Porter, billionaire climate activistTom SteyerandSan José Mayor Matt Mahan— condemned USC’s selection criteria but did not pull out of the debate.

The candidates who were furiousthey were not included were formerLos Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, former State ControllerBetty Yee, ex-U.S. Health and Human ServicesSecretary Xavier Becerra,. and State SuperintendentTony Thurmond. All four of those candidates are not white.

“We are a minority-majority state, and the idea that the four candidates of color are not going to be on the stage to bring those perspectives, to really speak to those communities, is really not doing right by the voters,” Yee complained last week.

Villaraigosa celebrated USC’s cancellation of the debate on Tuesday, saying the school made the “right call.”

The two Republican candidates who were invited to the debate were former Fox News commentatorSteve Hiltonand Riverside County SheriffChad Bianco.

Hilton ripped USC’s decision on Tuesday, saying in a statement,“A Republican is leading in the polls, so what do Democrats do? Cancel the debate. What a total joke California Democrats have become.”

USC defended its formula for selecting the candidates in a statement.

“The methodology was based on well-established metrics consistent with formulas widely used to set debate participation nationwide — a combination of polling and fundraising — and developed without regard to any particular candidate,” the school said.

The university added it is now looking for “other opportunities” to educate voters. California will elect the successor to Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) later this year.

https://www.mediaite.com/politics/california-university-cancels-governor-debate-over-blowback-for-candidates-being-all-white/

The whole election will be rigged anyway, let all the Dems act like monkeys!

‘Embarrassing’: Boebert Gets Into Nasty Spat With Reporter Who Accused Her of Making ‘Stuff Up’

Alex Griffing

Mar 24th, 2026, 5:28 pm

‘Embarrassing’: Boebert Gets Into Nasty Spat With Reporter Who Accused Her of Making ‘Stuff Up’

Alex Griffing

Mar 24th, 2026, 5:28 pm

Share

223 comments

UNITED STATES – MARCH 4: Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., talks with reporters outside the Capitol Hill Club after a meeting of the House Republican Conference on Tuesday, March 4, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP Images)

Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) got into a spat with Reason journalist Billy Binion this week after Binion called her out for a misleading statement on airport security lines.

The exchange began with Boebert posting a clip to X under the caption, “You can’t make this stuff up!! ICE agents show up at airports, and suddenly TSA wait times in Minneapolis drop to less than five minutes! Called it!!”

In the video, Boebert added, “So, President Trump sends ICE agents to the airports across the country, and while the rest of our country has three-plus-hour waits — thanks, Democrats — Minneapolis Airport’s TSA wait time right now is less than five minutes. Called it.”

Binion hit back, “‘You can’t make this stuff up!!’ is a funny way to start this because Lauren Boebert did, in fact, make this stuff up. ICE agents are not at the Minneapolis airport, where TSA lines have been consistently quick. We are living in an episode of Veep.”

“I never said they were? Keep trying, tho,” Boebert later replied toBinion, who then quoted her words back to her:

“ICE agents show up at airports, and suddenly TSA wait times in Minneapolis drop to less than five minutes!”

Once again: ICE agents aren’t in Minneapolis, where wait times were always brief. They didn’t drop. Read your own post back to yourself slowly.

Jf6Oh6wf_normal.jpg

Rep. Lauren Boebert

-F-N-SZE_bigger.jpg

@RepBoebert

You can’t make this stuff up!!

ICE agents show up at airports, and suddenly TSA wait times in Minneapolis drop to less than five minutes!

Called it!!

“It’s not your fault. Our schools failed you,” replied Boebert as the spat continued.

Binion then offered commentary on the whole episode, adding, “I know we’re desensitized to this,but it’s still deeply unserious that many sitting members of Congress spend their taxpayer-funded salaries chasing attention on social media and lobbing juvenile insults at strangers. Embarrassing.”

“Evergreen: ==A lot of politicians treat Congress like a stage for performance art and influencer stunts. A slap in the

face to taxpayers,” he concluded.

https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/embarrassing-boebert-gets-into-nasty-spat-with-reporter-who-accused-her-making-stuff-up/

(He’s right, Bobert is weird and acts like a teenager)

>>24423980. KEK

>>24423937. Sorry I try to limit it

>>24423103 California Election Fraud Crimes Caught on Camera. O’Keefe VideoPN

In-Person ELECTION FRAUD CRIMES Caught On Camera

O’Keefe Media Group

Video Attached

BREAKING: CALIFORNIA MASS IN-PERSON ELECTION FRAUD CRIMES CAUGHT ON CAMERA:

Recordings Show Homeless Are Paid By Petitioners To FORGE Real Voters’ Signatures To Sign Ballot Petitions On Skid Row, Thousands of Times.

Disenfranchised Voters Say They Are OUTRAGED After Being Shown Their Signatures Are Forged

Undercover in Los Angeles, James O’Keefe uncovered an election fraud pyramid scheme operating on Skid Row.

In Part II of Cash for Ballots, series hidden camera footage shows petition circulators paying homeless individuals $2–$3 per form to sign ballot petitions using the names and addresses of real registered voters and forging their signatures. Circulators provided printed lists of voters, assigned identities, and directed the homeless individuals exactly what to write, monitoring them to ensure the information matched so the circulators get paid.

“You only write what I tell you to write.”

“Your name’s Robert.”

“If you mess up, I can’t get paid.”

The conduct captured appears to violate multiple California felony statutes, including Elections Code §18613 (signing another person’s name to a petition), Penal Code §470 (forgery), Elections Code §18601–18602 (paying for petition signatures), and Penal Code §470 (forging signatures).

The OMG team and Cam Higby visited addresses tied to the voters' names being used. One resident said the named voter had not lived at the address for nearly a decade, yet election mail was still being delivered.

“Doesn’t live here, uh I bought this house nearly 9 years ago. The only reason I know that name, is because we still get her mail.”

“i always feel really weird when I get the voting ballot. Cause like, you know, obviously that’s fraudulent.”

This is Part II of an ongoing investigation. The Citizen Justice League will continue to release more footage of these crimes caught on tape.

20.38

https://youtu.be/39NV4B5Mb2o

Eric Daugherty

@EricLDaugh

🚨 HOLY SMOKES! SCOTUS Justice Samuel Alito CALLED OUT liberals Ketanji Jackson and Sotomayor for playing word games to facilitate a migrant invasion of America_

He is so good 🔥

"I believe that BOTH you and Justice Sotomayor and Justice Jackson on several occasions have used the phrase 'arriving at.'"

"I think you said you 'arrived at' your house, but that's not the term that is in the statute. Do you think there is no difference between 'arriving at' a location and arriving IN the location?"

"Does a person arrive IN the house when the person is not IN the house and is knocking at the door asking to be admitted to the house?!"

LAWYER: "Yes, I think here, the door is open, the officer is standing on the other side of the threshold."

Alito here was vouching FOR the Trump admin's position that we should be able to turn away invaders.

8:03 PM · Mar 24, 2026

·

394.5K

Views

https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/2036594732537684062?s=20

Watters: Iran brought us a gift…

1 hour ago

Fox News host Jesse Watters discusses the conflict in Iran as President Donald Trump’s Operation Epic Fury nears one month

11:07

https://youtu.be/wwnLWwRJq-Q