dChan
Anonymous ID: a77cad March 25, 2026, 11:38 a.m. No.24426191   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6196

>>24426159

>The attorney explained that police have qualified immunity that protects them

>removing consequences for breaking the law.

He's wrong. QI gets stripped when they break the law.

Anonymous ID: a77cad March 25, 2026, 11:44 a.m. No.24426215   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6223

>>24426205

>I strongly support the Death Penalty for Election Fraud.

THIS! The fraud would end real quick if that were signed into federal law.

 

Community Organizer: "each time you vote, we'll give you a cigarette"

Street Person: "''Fuck that'', they give the death penalty for that shit"

Anonymous ID: a77cad March 25, 2026, 11:57 a.m. No.24426265   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6273 >>6276 >>6293 >>6301

>>24426254

The Nuremberg Code (1947)

 

''Permissible Medical Experiments''

 

The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

 

  1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

 

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

  1. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

  2. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.

  3. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

  4. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

  5. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

  6. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.

  7. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

  8. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

  9. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

Anonymous ID: a77cad March 25, 2026, 12:18 p.m. No.24426339   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6370

>>24426312

Wrong. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Code

 

The Nuremberg Code (German: Nürnberger Kodex) is a set of ethical research principles for human experimentation created by the court in U.S. v Brandt, one of the Subsequent Nuremberg trials that were held after the Second World War.

 

Though it was articulated as part of the court's verdict in the trial, the Code would later become significant beyond its original context; in a review written on the 50th anniversary of the Brandt verdict, Jay Katz writes that "a careful reading of the judgment suggests that [the authors] wrote the Code for the practice of human experimentation whenever it is being conducted.

 

>>24426310

Sort of, it's an ethical agreement. In his 2014 review, Gaw observes that the Code "not only entered the legal landscape, but also became the prototype for all future codes of ethical practice across the globe." The idea of free or informed consent also served as the basis for International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects proposed by the World Health Organization.

Anonymous ID: a77cad March 25, 2026, 1:06 p.m. No.24426499   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6503

>>24426489

Fully agree anon. Also Harley doesn't make dirt bikes, or sport bikes, so I never understood this kind of mentality → >>24426440

 

It's not as common as it used to be, but their are still some out there that hold firmly to that.