BREAKING: Jury finds two tech giants liable in landmark social media trial, awards $3M in damages(that’s like one cent to them, not a problem for them)
Kerri Urbahn and Josh Ritter react to the landmark verdict in which a jury found Meta and YouTube liable for negligence and failure to warn, with an additional finding of malice, oppression, or fraud.
15:32
https://youtu.be/Kyy6wfWs2zM
Newsom better ‘LAWYER UP’: James Comer
Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., discusses the House Oversight Committee’s investigation into fraud in California
(I’m sure the DOJ is investigating how much Newsom and his buddies made off these scams. That’s just the tip of iceberg when it comes to fraud in CA)
2:48
https://youtu.be/BzCqQdmA9pE
McEnany: This is TERRIFYING…
'Outnumbered' panelists discuss the Department of Transportation's efforts to crack down on illegal immigrants with commercial driver's licenses.
(1/2 of the truckers that go through FL weigh don’t speak English, so they can’t read either, and that’s just Fl)
7:45
https://youtu.be/e54P3ZpmJOE
Big News – House Intel
Committee Releases Hidden Transcript of Inspector General Michael Atkinson. (1/3)
March 25, 2026 | Sundance |
For the past several years I have been advocating for ‘sunlight as the best disinfectant.’ Since September of 2025 I have been working through a painfully slow and convoluted process to share research, assist truth tellers and guide those who have the authority to deliver the sunlight. Today, I can happily report on progress.
In 2019 an impeachment effort against President Trump was triggered when a member of the National Security Council named Alexander Vindman coordinated with a member of the National Intelligence Council named Eric Ciaramella to fabricate a false claim that President Trump leveraged his power and authority to demand Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy release information on Joe and Hunter Biden’s corrupt financial dealings in Ukraine.
At the time of the 2019 impeachment construct Eric Ciaramella was working for the CIA as an analyst within the National Intelligence Council (NIC).
Two years prior to the 2019 impeachment construct, in January 2017, the same CIA analyst, Eric Ciaramella, had worked on the fraudulent Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) at the behest of CIA Director John Brennan.
[SIDEBAR: In 2025 Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, working with CIA Director John Ratcliffe, removed the NIC from inside the CIA. To provide greater overall transparency within the intelligence community, the National Intelligence Council was moved into the purview of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)].
Key point: Eric Ciaramella was one of the key analysts who constructed the fraudulent ‘Russian interference ICA’ (2017) and later the fraudulent impeachment effort (2019). Eric Ciaramella became the “anonymous CIA whistleblower” in the 2019 impeachment effort.
Before 2019, CIA analysts weren’t allowed to anonymously make claims against political officials. Because of the sensitive information they handled, any allegation of wrongdoing based on intelligence had to be made with their name attached.
Intelligence Community Inspector General MichaelAtkinson changed or modified the ICIG rules permitting Ciaramella to remain anonymous and make a claim that ultimately led to an impeachment effort.
Eric Ciaramella allegedly fabricated intelligence information, shared it with Congress and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), and then remained anonymous. HPSCI Chairman Adam Schiff was said to have assisted him.
On October 4, 2019, as part of the House impeachment inquiry, Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson gave closed-door testimony to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) as part of their impeachment investigation. One of the key questions to ICIG Atkinson surrounded the authority of his office changing the CIA whistleblower rules that permitted Eric Ciaramella to remain anonymous.
During later questioning by then-Congressman John Ratcliffe, as part of the House impeachment effort, it came to light that Inspector General Michael Atkinson testified CIA analyst Eric Ciaramella, the anonymous ‘whistleblower’, had lied about key details when questioned by Atkinson. WATCH VIDEO:
Ratcliffe: Release testimony about whistleblower's contact with Schiff
Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas) asks why IG Atkinson's testimony regarding the whistleblower's contact with Schiff and his staff wasn't released during his questioning in a House Judiciary Committee hearing on impeachment. (Dec. 9, 2019)
5:01
https://youtu.be/TYM4-Vj34xY
[The look on Dan Goldman’s face during that questioning was both priceless and insufferable. John Ratcliffe is now CIA Director]
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/03/25/big-news-house-intel-committee-releases-hidden-transcript-of-inspector-general-michael-atkinson/
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/03/25/big-news-house-intel-committee-releases-hidden-transcript-of-inspector-general-michael-atkinson/
It’s worth reemphasizing that Eric Ciaramella was both the analyst behind the disputed 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment for Director Brennan and, later in 2019, involved in the contested impeachment effort. Both operations involved impeding and targeting President Donald Trump.
If congress, or more importantly the American public, had known CIA Analyst Eric Ciaramella was both the key author of the fraudulent 2016 ICA and the later 2019 CIA complaint,it’s doubtful any impeachment effort would have moved forward.
Inside the Intelligence Community oversight system, the Ciaramella connection to both IC operations could have been made. His anonymity as a whistleblower served a purpose.[DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s 2025 decision to remove the National Intelligence Council from behind the curtain of the CIA is additionally supported with this hindsight.]
Thetranscript of Inspector General Michael Atkinson’s testimony becomes a key documentto release becauseat its core we know that Atkinson testified that Ciaramella lied. The Ciaramella lie is at the heart of the impeachment attempt.
Don’t get lost in the details or the politics of this. When you peel back all the layers of DC, at its epicenter this was an operation to impeach a sitting President that came from within the CIA, andit almost succeeded. {GO DEEP}
When a top administration intelligence official, holding what I believe to be the best possibility of making a difference,reached out, I began the assist by citing specific documents that would reveal a much bigger story==. The Atkinson transcript was one of those documents.
I have outlined how thesilo system is constructed to intentionally impede or stopreview.Adam Schiff isn’t stupid. He knew what he was doing andhow to use the separation of powers for his purposes. The executive branch would not easily be able to reach into the legislative branch and extract information. That’s why then HPSCI Chairman, Impeachment Chairman and now SenatorAdam Schiff buried the Atkinson transcript in the vault of the House Intelligence Committee.
The process.
♦ First, you need a republican President in the White House √. Second, you need an aligned Intelligence Community DNI √, and third you need a Republican controlled HPSCI √:
[¹] •To extract the transcript the Executive would first need to understand its value.
• Then the Executive would need to know where it was. • Then the Executive would need a qualified stakeholder, with appropriate clearances, to request to review the transcript in the HPSCI secure compartmented intelligence facility (scif).
• If the HPSCI approved, the Executive would be given an appointment date to read it (no notes, no copying, just reading).
• Then, after reading, the Executive stakeholder would then need to request the HPSCI Chair and Ranking Member for a classified copy.
• The Chair and Ranking Member would need to agree to the value of the sunlight on the Legislative Branch controlled information.
•To get a copy the entire House Intelligence Committee would need to vote on the release to the Executive. •The vote would need to be scheduled on the committee calendar.
•A HPSCI vote would then take place:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/03/25/big-news-house-intel-committee-releases-hidden-transcript-of-inspector-general-michael-atkinson/
(3/3). [SOURCE]
• WASHINGTON, D.C.— ==Today, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence held a business meeting to consider multiple Committee actions. During the business meeting, the Committee voted in favor of releasing two transcripts from 2019 hearings with the former Intelligence Community Inspector General, Michael Atkinson
• The hearings were held toexamine Atkinson’s role in an alleged whistleblower complaint, which ultimately led to Democrats’ first impeachment efforts against President Trump in December 2019.
One transcript would be released to the ODNI for classification review, and then subsequentlyreleased to the publicby the Committee with the second unclassified transcript.
• “The great deal of widespread speculation about the Atkinson classified hearing transcript is indicative of the American people’s complete and warranted mistrust of the Intelligence Community ” said Chairman Crawford.
“In fartoo many instances, the IC hides behind the veil of overclassification. Sometimes sunlight is the best disinfectant. . As part of the Committee’s continued effort to balance the transparency the American people deserve and the need to protect sensitive national security information, we hope that the release of these transcripts allows the American people to make their own determinations. As Chairman, I remain committed to ensuring this Committee, where possible, is transparent as the IC works to rebuild trust with the American people.”
• The transcripts will be posted on the Committee website once they undergo the standard classification review with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. (source)
The HPSCI has voted to release the Atkinson Transcript.
Director of National Intelligence.Tulsi Gabbard will now walk the unhidden transcript through the declassification process. The fastest way is through President Trump’s office. Hopefully the redactions will be minimal. Then we will all get to see it.
This has been a long, frustrating and complicated process – but we have succeeded.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/03/25/big-news-house-intel-committee-releases-hidden-transcript-of-inspector-general-michael-atkinson/
Would a creative anon take the picture and put nooses on the heads of all of them?
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen Resigns Following Massive Election Losses in Left-Wing Coalition
March 25, 2026 | Sundance |
The Trump curse is real.
With what she perceived as strong domestic support following her confrontation with President Trump, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksendecided to trigger an early election.
Frederiksen thought the timing was perfect;however, it backfired.
Mette Frederiksen’s political partysuffered the biggest ruling party election defeat in 120+ years, and her coalition of left-wing partiesnow lost their majority.
As a result of the election,Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has resigned.
COPENHAGEN, March 25 (Reuters) – Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen on Wednesday submitted her government’s resignation to the king after her three-party coalition suffered a large defeatin a general election, the royal palace said in a statement.
Parties are set to launch potentially tough and long negotiations to determine whether the next government will be formed by Frederiksen or another party leader. (link)
Via Washington Examiner – “[…] The Social Democrats’ left-wing bloc walked away as the ostensible winners of the Tuesday general election with 84 seats in the nation’s 179-seat parliament.But it was far from a majority, with their rival right-wing bloc securing 77 seats and the centrist Moderate Party walking away with 14.
[…] The Social Democrats remain the single largest party in the legislature with 38 seats and 21.9% of the vote, but it’s a hollow victory for the long-dominating juggernaut of Danish politics.The last time the Social Democrats did worse was in 1903 with 20.4%.
The Royal Palace confirmed on Wednesday that Frederiksen resignedand advised the sovereign to hold meetings with the leaders of thenation’s 12 major political parties— standard procedure after an election shifts the balance of power in the parliament. (read more)
The European Union didn’t think they needed to provide any support to their socialist candidate Mette Frederiksen; they were certain all the Danes would rally in support. Major facepalm.
Domestic issuesdominated the electorate, including immigration, the cost of living, welfare, energy policy and agriculture.
To understand just how filled with hubris they were going into the election, watch this video (prompted):
PM Mark Carney holds joint news conference with Nordic leaders in Oslo– March 15, 2026
During the Canada-Nordic Summit in Oslo, Norway, Prime Minister Mark Carney takes part in a joint news conference with his Nordic counterparts Jonas Gahr Støre (Norway), Mette Frederiksen (Denmark), Petteri Orpo (Finland), Kristrún Frostadóttir (Iceland), and Ulf Kristersson (Sweden). The leaders face questions from journalists concerning the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, threats to national sovereignty, Arctic security, defence procurement, and nuclear weapons.
33:36
https://www.youtu.be/q0HkAYpMIJk
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/03/25/danish-prime-minister-mette-frederiksen-resigns-following-massive-election-losses-in-left-wing-coalition/#more-281922