>This isn't a message board
I have some bad news for you, anon.
>>24441157
>Are we allowed to talk about it yet?
You are still free to say it here, but the bakers will not label it as notable and the janitors might lock the thread early if you make too much noise.
>>>24441157
>>Are we allowed to talk about it yet?
>You are still free to say it here, but the bakers will not label it as notable and the janitors might lock the thread early if you make too much noise.
Oh, wait, probably I spoke too soon – it looks like someone takes the trouble to proactively delete anything impolite.
>The distractions are pure UniParty terror. The Epstein Files are finally taking down Dems/Cabal worldwide. And the reality of Trump not being involved in the way so many hoped and lied about is devastating.
So … if we could publicly name the rich people who engaged in sex trafficking for Pizzagate … that would be great.
>>24441189
I remember back in the days when imageboards stood up to inspire freedom of speech in other media. Imageboards were never efficient or scholarly – efficiency and scholarship were not the point. Imageboards existed to say things that would get the poster censored elsewhere. What has this board become, anon? Is this still the place where we can speak our minds freely, legally? Is this why we followed Jim out from the old domain name at 8ch.net?
I can't engage with the poster who keeps getting censored. By the time my posts show up, his posts have vanished.
>when spam shills become single themed repeat tards they advance to next level actionables
So … are you quite sure that you are applying the "single-themed" filter impartially? If so, bake away. You do it all for free.