Anonymous ID: 1c8c61 March 30, 2026, 12:46 p.m. No.24445340   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5350 >>5360

pb

>>24443861

>Jules v.Andre Balazs Properties(25-83)

 

>https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/25-83.html

 

 

OH SHIT

 

André Balazs

André Balazs in a black suit, standing against a branded backdrop

Balazs at the 2012 Time 100 gala

Born André Tomas Balazs[1]

 

January 31, 1957 (age 69)

Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.

Alma mater

 

Cornell University

Columbia University

 

Occupations

 

Hotelier

Residential developer

 

Known for

 

Standard Hotels

Chateau Marmont

 

Spouse Katie Ford

(m. 1985; div. 2004)​

Partner Cosima Vesey (2017–present)

Children 3

Anonymous ID: 1c8c61 March 30, 2026, 12:55 p.m. No.24445360   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>24445340

AI Overview

+6

Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties

(Docket 25-83) is a 2026 Supreme Court case examining whether federal courts retain jurisdiction to confirm or vacate arbitration awards, even if they would lack jurisdiction over the initial lawsuit. It centers on a fired Chateau Marmont employee who failed in arbitration.

Key Aspects of the Case:

 

The Dispute: Former security guard Adrian Jules sued Andre Balazs Properties and related entities in 2020 in the Southern District of New York for employment discrimination.

Arbitration Ruling: The case was sent to arbitration, where the arbitrator ruled against Jules on all claims and sanctioned him and his attorney.

Lower Court Action: The Second Circuit upheld the district court’s decision to confirm the adverse arbitration award, despite arguments that the court lacked jurisdiction under Badgerow v. Walters.

Supreme Court Review: The Court will resolve a circuit split on whether a federal court, having stayed a case pending arbitration, has authority to confirm or vacate the award.

 

The case was set for argument in early 2026.