>A stark choice: endure the complete annihilation of their water, electricity, and energy infrastructure - or accept a deal that requires abandoning their nuclear ambitions - handing over enriched uranium, dismantling all enrichment facilities, relinquishing control of the Strait of Hormuz, halting the production and storage of long-range ballistic missiles, and ending support for their proxies.
>Tictoc
Yes , TickTok
-
"complete anyalation", of elec in a country that has lived there for 1000's yrs without power, most don't use.
-
Who says another country can't have nikes? pakistan? northKorea? Who says u-s-I is global police?
Who says the u-s-I has enough troops willing to die for another country? How many? 100K? 200k? maybe 1m, in an all out conqure & hodl senerio? Given up against maybe 1b all willing to die, on home turf, embedded in caves & tunnels, with endless supply of drones etc…
Yanks got head up ass & can't see, just think "invinsible" & willing to back a greatest ally, who run a trojan horse that runs the u-s-I …
djt should have NEVER been drawn into vietnam 2.0 imho. But here we are… "Stupid is as Stupid does" -Forrest