>>2447374

You're done dude. You have no more credibility. You're from England, yet you have a huge interest in Trump for some reason and are very determined to be a mod of T_D at reddit (and you were called out by Q).

So let's think logically here. What country has been instrumental in framing Trump and assisting in undermining his presidency? Great Britain? Who would have a huge interest in controlling the narrative to help cover up their crimes? Great Britain again?

Of course you're going to put out some legit info in order to gain some credibility (like zionist shill Alex Jones), but everyone here knows you're true intentions.

>>2447917

Later. Tell David Brock hello for us

>>2447922

I love how they "debunked" pizzagate. The NYT ran an article saying it was debunked (without actually debunking any of the actual details), then every other outlet linked to that NYT article as proof that it had been debunked.

Now they've resorted to claiming that pizzagate was about Hillary running a child-trafficking ring out of CPP's basement (which was never the claim of pizzagaters) because that CAN be easily debunked. We recognize their dirty tricks and they will ultimately backfire on them

>>2448042

And those who try to talk like Q or act like they're Q. People will do anything for twitter followers (including spamming their stupid shit here on the boards)