>>2448105

>>2448105

So, the images from Judicial Watch are leaked and top secret? (The answer is "non". JW doesn't leak - they provide information that is covered by FOIA, 1A, etc. Don't think it gets more legit than JW, tbh.)

Personal opinion: IF someone said "Psst, nerds! I have some classified information I'm just gonna leave here!" it would OF COURSE BE FAKE AND GAY!

It's coming from an unreliable source (due to the violation of their clearances/contracts/whathaveyou) and their motives are automatically suspect. Maybe the information shared is accurate, maybe it isn't; yet both the source and motive are fucked from the start.

Anyway - no asked for an epistemology exercise. Am just saying.

>>2448309

Funny (weird) thing: I not-GOOG'd JT's childhood friend, somethingsomething Ingv@ldson and kapow: The internet at my hotel broke.

I do believe in coincidences, tho.

Funny (weird) about the timing.

That is all.

>>2448534

Have no idea what you're saying.

Clarification, plz.

>>2448551

Why?

>>2448574

Huh!

Interesting!

>>2448430

Earlier this year or late last year, I looked through the Defense section on WhiteHouse.gov and noticed a pretty significant, ah, upgrade, in the Cyber Dept. spending.

Being a Humanities anon vs. a STEM anon, I was like, "well that's interesting - all of this spending on thin clients, etc." and left it at that, for the most part.

And then Nakasone habbened.

So, I am now like, "THAT IS REALLY INTERESTING - ALL OF THIS SPENDING."

What the fuck is a thin client? Am 100% confident that MY understanding of a thin client is different than a different kind of nerd's understanding of a thin client.