Anonymous ID: e8c190 Aug. 4, 2018, 7:53 a.m. No.2448199   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8252

>>2448162

Yep and he has his own stretch of interstate. Believe it's called the "Barack Obama Memorial Highway" and it's a TOLL ROAD. How ironic. They tried to make it a STATE holiday, aka state workers get day off (they're already bankrupting this fucking state). I'm ashamed to live in this shit hole and the thing is IL is blood red south and west of Crook County. Maybe 4 or 6 blue counties. Rest are red.

Anonymous ID: e8c190 Aug. 4, 2018, 7:57 a.m. No.2448246   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8548

>>2448184

>boot camp has gone soft

Yep I remember when DIs used to be able to physically batter recruits, fuck with their food, shit like that. Now they can't even call them "pussies" or shit deemed "derogatory." I don't even wanna see the guidelines/policy for drill instructors.

Anonymous ID: e8c190 Aug. 4, 2018, 8:04 a.m. No.2448347   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8446

>>2448280

Actually no, no one (who's truly awake) will say there's 45k indictments. They're fucking sealed PROCEEDINGS and NOT indictments. Some are indictments, some are search warrants, all kinds of shit. A shit ton of them are MS-13. Point is we need to stop calling them indictments because that is false. "Proceedings" is the correct term.

Anonymous ID: e8c190 Aug. 4, 2018, 8:05 a.m. No.2448363   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8379 >>8405

>>2448342

This will go to SCOTUS. Hell, even the Second Circuit may tell Cuomo he can't do this. 1A infringements are not looked on very kindly by any court. Strict scrutiny applies in many 1A cases. This is usurping the First Amendment in order to usurp the Second Amendment.

Anonymous ID: e8c190 Aug. 4, 2018, 8:15 a.m. No.2448479   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2448405

Ironically, the NRA would likely be able to recover damages under 42 USC 1983, specifically Monell v. Department of Social Serv., 436 U.S. 658 (1978). New York set the civil damages precedent, hence the irony. Government conspiracy to infringe on constitutional right(s). This is the definition of a top-down conspiracy to infringe.

Anonymous ID: e8c190 Aug. 4, 2018, 8:19 a.m. No.2448517   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8575 >>8861

>>2448446

They're not ALL indictments. That list can't possibly exclusively contain indictments. That'd be tens or hundreds of thousands of defendants. They can't even process all of the illegals so do you really think they can process a six figure amount of American citizens? Unless they're planning on the Chinese assembly line system of prosecution (kangaroo court followed by a bullet to the brain behind the courthouse or lethal injection van).

Anonymous ID: e8c190 Aug. 4, 2018, 8:29 a.m. No.2448614   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2448575

I don't care what court it is, ad law or fucking criminal, I did not intent to conflate the two. My point is, regardless of court, they CANNOT process and adjudicate tens/hundreds of thousands. It isn't possible. They would have to actually fucking try these people. Think about the Gotti RICO trial times 5000.

Anonymous ID: e8c190 Aug. 4, 2018, 8:38 a.m. No.2448708   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2448659

>"The numbers represent new sealed court proceedings filed in U.S. Federal District Criminal Courts during the periodsโ€ฆ"

Must place emphasis on PROCEEDINGS and (collectively and individually) stop calling this a list of indictments because that's misleading at best.