Other LOGIC anons…I've been running this over in my head as it seems to be something that has been bothering me. Help organizing the structure or premises…
LOGIC structure: If A is true, then it doesn't matter how it was obtained. The public deserves to know.
Liberal/MSM/Left Premise:
1) The info on Russian Collusion is true.
Therefore, it doesn't matter how the information (Steele Dossier paid for by Clinton/DNC) was obtained, the public has a right to know. Therefore, we are not fake media.
Now, we can argue about the Premise, because we know that the information is likely NOT true, but let's apply the same structural argument:
LOGIC structure: If A is true, then it doesn't matter how it was obtained. The public deserves to know.
1) The DNC information about sabotaging Bernie Sanders is admitted to be true (premise)
Therefore, it doesn't matter how the info was obtained (Russian "hacking") the public deserves to know.
So they tried to use this logical argument to undermine Trump and call for Impeachment, but they cry foul when the same exact logical argument was used to reveal fuckery at the DNC, which ended up costing them probably significant votes.
The MSM and the Left are being entirely inconsistent, logically, and that is another reason why they are FAKE NEWS.