But you're still here mocking.
I wonder why.
>>24494528 lb
Connects with Venice Italy; Pirates, Black Nobility?
Islamic Renegade Christian delivered Island of Malta to Suliman Sutan's son, in Constantinople, (after the Muslims took it from the Christians?)
How did the Christians get Island of Malta back; or did they?
Dig?
What ? That you're a shill?
No — the Islamic renegade (Kılıç Ali Pasha / Uchali / Occhiali) did not deliver the island of Malta itself. He only delivered the captured flag/banner of the Order of Malta (the white eight-pointed cross on red, exactly like the one in the Titian and Goya portraits
This happened after a naval battle in 1570 near Cape Passaro, where his forces captured a Maltese galley (with only three badly wounded knights left alive on board). He later presented that banner to Sultan Selim II (Suleiman the Magnificent’s son) in Constantinople as a trophy of victory. Cervantes describes it in the Don Quixote Captive’s Tale
“how did Christians get Malta back?”
1453: Ottoman Turks (under Mehmed II) conquered Constantinople from the Christian Byzantine Empire. That city stayed Ottoman from then on — no “Christians taking it back” in this story.
1522: The same Ottomans (under Suleiman the Magnificent) conquered the island of Rhodes, the Knights Hospitaller’s previous base. The Knights were left homeless for eight years.
1530: Holy Roman Emperor Charles V (King of Sicily) granted the islands of Malta, Gozo, and the North African port of Tripoli to the Knights in perpetual fief. In exchange, they paid a symbolic annual tribute of one live falcon (the exact historical detail that inspired the MacGuffin in The Maltese Falcon).
So maybe, to solve the mystery, that Charles 5 details need be scrutinized?
notice the red jewel in the hanging pendant around Sultan Selim II (Suleiman the Magnificent’s son) neck.
image supposedly taken from actual historical records; such as they are.
he large red stone (a ruby or spinel) you see around the neck/chest in that generated portrait of Sultan Selim II is based in historical reality, not pure imagination.
The model (Grok Imagine) chose that specific placement and color as part of the standard Ottoman imperial ornamentation.
Red Ring Connect?
Why red? Red gemstones (especially rubies and spinels) were the most prized jewels in the 16th-century Ottoman court. They symbolized sovereignty, power, blood, and imperial authority. Sultans and high officials routinely wore them as large pendants, medallions, or central jewels on chest ornaments and belts. Historical miniatures and surviving artifacts from the Topkapı Palace treasury are full of exactly this kind of large red gem set in gold.
Real historical portraits of Selim II (and other sultans of the era) show similar jeweled belts and chest decorations with prominent red stones. For example, one well-known album portrait of Selim II highlights his “bejeweled belt” and red accents. The exact medallion in the generated image isn’t copied from one single surviving painting, but the overall look is faithful to how Ottoman court artists depicted imperial regalia.
So it’s an authentic detail grounded in real Ottoman fashion and symbolism
The dangling necklace?
Also seen in the Order of the Golden Fleece.
Nice boomerang if "they" get their on these days in 2026
Remember Adolf identified as a Roman Catholic.
Nice boomerang if "they" get their's on these days in 2026
Hagia Sophia was originally a Christian Church, appropriated by Islam and turned to a Mosque.
The high turban of the Sultan was to "better" the papal hat (3 stories tall) by making it 4 stories, so they say.
Could it be to hide a cone head?
kkekkk
mafia has no trouble evicting tenants / squatters.
Why doesn't POOOP take some refugees?
No WW3 yet.
Not enough armed opponents.
The two World Wars were staged in any case, by the same side.
There would have been a WW3
IF
kamifalalalalala had won. Or psycho Hillary before her.
God is Good
That's how the fake news fucks up your head.