Anonymous ID: c3e036 Feb. 2, 2018, 2:54 a.m. No.245272   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5278

OK campers, rise and shine. And don't forget your booties because it's cold out there today.

 

Here's to hoping the memo does not see a shadow (and 6 more weeks of bluepill)

Anonymous ID: c3e036 Feb. 2, 2018, 3:23 a.m. No.245397   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5412

>>245010

>>245276

Out of all the horrible things brought up from all this (spirit cooking, 9/11, the Fed, and on and on…) I'm finding myself surprised that the hardest redpill to take has been Snowden. I've always been of the mind-set that the public knowing about (and crucially having evidence of) excessive surveillance was by far for the common good.

 

Bill Benny, as per Q along with all I've seen of him, definitely a Patriot. Isn't the whole thing of true patriotism to call out the gov for overstepping it's bounds? There's been tons of parallels between Ellsberg's Pentagon Papers and Snowden's leaks, and I'm still on the side of both of them being in the public's interest.

 

From No Such Agency's and MI's stand point, can definitely see how Snow's leaks were massively detrimental to their capability, while at same time being great for the Clowns who now had access to all the shiny best toys. Is it possible that Snowden was conned by the deep state to do a partially right (but overwhelmingly -MI / +clowns) thing for the right reason?

 

Been re-reading all crumbs on said topic. Usually Q is quite clear on labelling traitors and patriots. I find all the @Snowden to be rather ambiguous. Confidence shaken, but ultimately postponing judgement until last act hopefully reveals more info.