>>24501730
My memory was weak, but I did remember the name, Olmstead Decision by the SCOTUS
>>24501550 lb
landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in Olmstead v. L.C. (also called the Olmstead decision), issued on June 22, 1999
The case was brought by two women in Georgia—Lois Curtis (L.C.) and Elaine Wilson—who had mental illness and developmental disabilities. They had been voluntarily admitted to a state psychiatric hospital but were repeatedly told by their own doctors that they could live successfully in community-based settings (like supported housing with services). Instead, they were kept institutionalized for years, which limited their ability to work, socialize, and live independently.
dmh.mo.gov
They sued under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, arguing that unnecessary segregation in institutions was discrimination.
What the Supreme Court ruledIn a 6-3 decision (opinion written by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg), the Court held that unjustified institutionalization of people with disabilities is a form of unlawful discrimination under the ADA.
States (and other public entities) must provide community-based services instead of institutional care when all three of these conditions are met:The person's treatment professionals determine that community placement is appropriate.
The person does not oppose the community-based treatment.
The placement can be reasonably accommodated, taking into account the state's resources and the needs of others with disabilities.
olmsteadrights.org
This is often called the "integration mandate"—it requires services in the "most integrated setting appropriate" to the person's needs.
Why it mattered (and still does)
I think being very aged could be considered a physical disability.
It shifted policy away from large institutions toward home- and community-based services (HCBS) for people with disabilities.
It has been called one of the most important civil rights victories for people with disabilities in U.S. history, comparable to Brown v. Board of Education for ending segregation.
olmsteadrights.org
The decision applies to mental health, developmental disabilities, and other disabilities. States have had to create "Olmstead plans" to expand community options, though implementation has varied and enforcement continues today (including by the Department of Justice and HHS).
Yes, the Olmstead decision can and does apply to aged (elderly or senior) people—but with an important clarification.
acl.gov
Olmstead is grounded in Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities. It requires states to provide community-based services (instead of unnecessary institutionalization) when the three conditions are met: (1) professionals determine community placement is appropriate, (2) the person doesn’t oppose it, and (3) it’s a reasonable accommodation given resources.
hhs.gov
Aging itself is not considered a disability under the ADA. However, many older adults have disabilities (physical, cognitive, mental, or developmental) that qualify—such as mobility impairments, dementia, Alzheimer’s, arthritis, or other conditions that substantially limit major life activities like self-care, walking, or bathing.
Aging itself is not considered a disability under the ADA. However, many older adults have disabilities (physical, cognitive, mental, or developmental) that qualify—such as mobility impairments, dementia, Alzheimer’s, arthritis, or other conditions that substantially limit major life activities like self-care, walking, or bathing.
Aging itself is not considered a disability under the ADA. However,
>>24500972 lb