>>2450507

>>2449860 (lb)

Clearly, the wave of Q bashing is coordinated at a level above the individual media outlets and pundits. The consistency of both headlines, content, and assessment prove this beyond any doubt. Any outlet participating in the anti-Q campaign has outed themselves, and I'm certain that many regulars here could have predicted who would have joined the MSM from the ranks of the supposed "alt-media." Some of them were following orders long before now.

If Q is all nonsense, believed only by a class of basement dwelling, marginally sane, uneducated, cult-susceptible morons, as all the bandwagon jumpers so vigorously assert, then why bother to attack in such a coordinated manner? Are we going to see the same pack-attack on flat earthers, NASA skeptics, etc, etc?

I doubt it, because those beliefs (whether founded or not) don't upset the establishment gravy train.

The virulence of this week's onslaught on the Q phenomenon tells us all we need to know: Q is viewed as a clear and present danger to the establishment by its highest levels. Of course, the MSM and fellow travelers will argue that we are a threat to national security and public order, but that's only because that's the line they've been directed to adopt. None of them knows enough to have analyzed this movement, its values or its objectives, and the cry of violent extremism has not one scintilla of evidence in its support.

But this is how all threats to the status quo are branded, whether they be the civil rights movement, patriot militias, or the Tea Party. The anti-Q initiative is straight out of a well-worn playbook. The participants in the attack might have changed and diversified, but the orchestrators have not.

Those who ally themselves with this propaganda campaign are showing themselves for what they are: conformists to establishment privilege, doctrine, and propaganda methods. This is a strategy of de-legitimation and containment. I suspect that the anti-Q reaction has come too late to achieve its goals, as the traction achieved without fanfare is now beyond the ability of mere propaganda to extinguish.

We are in the firing line, but Truth is a mighty weapon. We must hold fast, Patriots.

>>2450842

So you think that cries of/signs saying "Lock Her Up" are less subversive that the Q movement?

That suggests you don't even believe in "Lock Her Up" as anything beyond a vacuous slogan.

I don't think you really understand what we're doing here and how this movement is perfectly aligned with POTUS' stated objectives.

>>2450901

I know you're playing devil's advocate…

But hasn't the media been attacking MAGA/POTUS for more than 2 years? Wouldn't they have continued to do so, with or without Q and using the same essential form of argument?

The fundamental fact is that we will all be attacked, regardless of who we are or what we say. But those attacks are not working. The media has little impact, because the majority doesn't believe what it says. POTUS retains plausible deniability vis a vis Q, and that is as it should be. But the objectives and values of the Q phenomenon are by no means divergent from POTUS' own clearly stated objectives.