A rebuttal to the term "conspiracy theory"
There was ''palace intrigue ''long before the countries of Europe as we know them today or The United States of America was formed.
Struggles for power, both behind the scenes and in public are real and have solid historical record.
Those Senators didn't all wake up on 15 March and converge, out of the blue, draw their knives and stab Caesar to death on a whim, with no coordination whatsoever.
Many princes murdered brothers and other relatives in order to be the one who ascended to the throne.
Coup d'etats are real, so are counter-coups.
Conspiracies take different forms - some fore mere financial gain, some for increase of power. For anyone to state or imply that conspiracies do not exist, displays the height of mendacity and dissembling.
A great many court criminal cases are won due to circumstantial evidence, not a smoking gun, as it were. Intelligence analysts are given data, they then sift through that data to see if there are connections between data points, patterns in activities or behaviors. They collate this in a coherent form and present it to their superiors in a report.
That is exactly what the citizen-researchers at /qresearch/ do:
-research a person, date, activity, business, location
-gather the results of the research and present them here
-sort through that data to decide what, if anything, is relevant
-determine if there are connections between relevant data points
It is a process, just like what intelligence analysts do. Are they always correct? If they are missing relevant data or if they begin with a faulty premise, then no. The same goes for anyone, not just the citizen-researchers on /qresearch/ or the 23 intelligence agencies of our government.
We seek Truth. We go where the data trail takes us, no matter how strange, disturbing or obscure.
We have no leader, no boss, no superior to set parameters of acceptable topics or limit our investigation into any one, anything, any place, etc.. We have the largest open-source research project powered by the largest amount of researchers and analysts in the history of the world, and it's being done for free, with no hope of recognition, praise, or personal gain.
The only people who would balk at this effort are those who are afraid of what the millions of anons worldwide will find.
Let that sink in for a moment.
I do not at all mind being called a "conspiracy theorist" as long as it is understood that I will label others as "coincidence theorists."