>>2450454 (lb)
>So we outlaw freedom of assembly & freedom of speech with a law and a government permit?
Most towns and cities already require a permit to assemble en masse in a public place. All I am suggesting is that counter protesters not be allowed to assemble in the same spot or on the same day.
>>2450422 (lb)
> Or the cops could just lock up the violent perps.
Yea, well, assuming there are enough cops available to do that, much less taxpayer money to pay them overtime.
IDK, not a lawfag but an anon yesterday pointed out that there could really only be about 5,000–something about the listings and I think co-defendants being cross-referenced or cross-listed, as it were. I think we need to be careful about using numbers we're not sure of. We need a lawfag who subcribes to pacer.gov to analyze and verify.
DEMOCRAT
Funny thing is Q is neither a conspiracy nor a theory.
Wear your Q shirt. Forget the sign. Or at least be prepared to leave sign outside.
^^^THIS.
EXCELLENT IDEA!!!
This is extremely dangerous to our democracy!
I like the way you think, Anon.