>>2451241

I keep seeing "CTA" but was always behind on the threads to ask what it referred to before… so what is it? It's not CTR (feeling a bit dense over here) ty

>>2451317

He admitted he's jewish, like Lauren Southern, and Moldbug etc.

every

single

time

>>2451459

tbqh it is nice to see someone else post your work here or especially elsewhere, nothing wrong with that. gloating however is unseemly in general; but I don't think the thankful anon was gloating imo

$0.02

>>2451486

don't think there's one for anon posts, but if you know the date of the post, you can call up old threads and do ctrl+f for the post #

Archives are listed at the top in the dough:

qarchives.ml | masterarchivist.github.io/qarchives/

and this takes up where MA's sites leave off:

Supplement to MasterArchivist —- main spreadsheet, 2nd tab at bottom (labeled) — https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M2AzhZKh2PjL7L7GVPN42Em0hZXKWMdhGnj59ZQ3YcQ/

These include all threads on 8ch, all boards

>>2451646

CTA

who or what does that acronym refer to?? haven't gotten an answer when I asked before

tyia

BAKER, NOTABLE

(lb)

>>2451053 Anon's rebuttal re: Conspiracy Theories

>>2451708

I see

>I still have absolutely no idea what the fuck is going on and I have no clue who those people are

kek

thanks anyway, I do appreciate the answer

>>2451743

> I'm having trouble discerning between anons whose Mr. Smith programming kicked in and actual shills.

That's the way it normally is. And, I'm not being a dick but truly serious, that is why you are typically supposed to lurk for 2 years before posting: so you can observe the interactions and learn to discern between anons/trolls/shills, learn the tactics and be able to spot and ignore them.

The chans are NOT for normies and the culture is the way it is on purpose. Jumping in feet first is confusing, disheartening, dismaying, and for some people, horrifying and hurtful.

If you are a genuine person who wants to learn and edify yoruself,

1 read the crumbs - every single one on qanon.pub

2 read the spreadsheet, which while it has holes in it, shows a lot of what anons found

3 read the discussions and the notables (are not endorsements)

4 re-read the crumbs

5 watch the discussions, pay attention to similar arguments, recycled graphics and repeating back&forth

6 learn to spot the bots

7 re-read the crumbs & spreadsheet

8 read the pdf

9 watch the discussions and play spot the shill (silently, without posting)

10 pick an item/topic, research it, post your results here and explain why it is relevant/how it ties into what is in the crumbs

Hope that helps

>>2451812

aaahhh, I see, thank you. I didn't recognize the acronym, got it.