Viory Video
@vioryvideo
Trump:
The USA will get all nuclear dust. No money will exchange hands in any way, shape, or form. We were going to take it anyway. But taking it that way is slightly more dangerous.
https://x.com/vioryvideo/status/2045263811737792902?s=20
==Trump’s “nuclear dust” comment is bigger than most people realize.
Nuclear material can be forensically fingerprinted.== The IAEA says isotopic signatures are commonly known as “fingerprints,” and nuclear forensics uses isotopic, chemical, and physical characteristics to help determine a material’s origin and history.
So when Trump says the U.S. will get the “nuclear dust,” the key point is not a cash payoff.
His public line is: no money changes hands directly.The framework he described is removal of enriched uranium as part of a peace arrangement, while frozen Iranian funds are handled separately.Reuters reported he said the U.S. would recover it “at a leisurely pace” with “big machinery.” [https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-recover-uranium-iran-trump-tells-reuters-2026-04-17/]
Here’s why people are connecting that to Uranium One:
If Iran turns over enriched uranium, forensic testing could potentially reveal origin and processing history. If any material were ever matched to prior streams or transfers, Uranium One would come under renewed scrutiny.
That is a forensic possibility.
Separate receipt:DOJ records later confirmed there was a written directive from Jeff Sessions to John Huber to review Uranium One / Clinton-related matters.
American Oversight published the Nov. 22, 2017 Sessions letter and the Whitaker email attaching it, after DOJ had earlier said no such written directive existed.
[https://americanoversight.org/featureddocument/doj-letter-from-jeff-sessions/]
Axios had already reported the earlierNov. 13, 2017 DOJ letter to Congress saying senior federal prosecutors were directed to evaluate issues raised about Uranium One and alleged unlawful dealings related to the Clinton Foundation, and to recommend whether any matters should be opened or merit a special counsel. [https://axios.com/2017/12/15/justice-dept-addresses-possibility-of-probes-involving-clinton-in-letter-1513306906]
cont'd