>>2451445 (lb)
>The only thing they'll have left to try is to step up pretending to be Q when we don't follow these people speaking for Q, they'll have to try to BE Q.
They would need control of the NSA for that. And we know that they do not ;)
God Bless Adm. Rogers!
>JMHO and we each have sort of pet-topics we like
Yes, there's lots of topics and methodologies to observe and research here, indeed :)
If it goes hot then it just adds evidence to the definite need for more and better equipped Constituional LEOs, nationwide, in all 50.
We need to start pushing this as a thing if that's how it's going to be.
#MoreConstitutionalLEO
>More military equipped police?
False. Police != Constitutional LEO. Police enforce corporate policy, hence the name. You're conflating. Because you know where this is going and you don't like it :)
>That seems exactly what tptb want.
False. [they] hate Constitutional Sheriffs. Because they answer to the Constitution, not [them]. [They] are on record (Obama admin) as harming sheriff's ability to do their jobs.
>Maybe they should disarm the populace also?
Fuck off with your leading question. Do you hate the 2a? I love it :)
>If you don't realize that is why the cabal finances both sides to foment civil war, you aren't paying attention.
Fuck off with your projection ;)
we won't be able to tell if the cat is free or not unless we look at the cat.
..And observing the cat might alter its freedom.
Hell of a paradox…
>What is this mythical constitutional LEO you speak?
Myth? kek. Have some edification.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheriffs_in_the_United_States