Me i am after the pattern.
My belief is it is way beyond 4D and 4D is just a small subset.>>2452751
LMFAO
Yes the pattern is very warped when viewed from inside the set.
I would take her on my AF! any time she wanted
I have not defined how many dimensions actually 8 is resonate, as many others, and 246 in the Lie 8 set has promise.
But if you are moving beyond 4D and include fractal I am not sure there is any limit on dimensions just limits on how they are combined to make a 'physical' reality as you have to create a 'bubble' on the pattern to create an 'external' reality from the base.
Possibly - i am not that math literate. It would be a subset of the pattern that is isolated from the rest of the pattern. it would receive info and give info to the full set but with a boundary shift at the edge of physical reality. IMO there are many of these physical realities within the pattern.
But topology is included in space time warp - that I think the tensors are just basic geometry. But I feel it is chicken or egg, and I feel that the underlying pattern is what creates it and mass and gravity are the way we perceive it.
Light bends by the deviation in space time - The question is what bends it? Gravity from Mass or the Pattern under the 4D that bends space time?
Chicken or egg?
Well waiting for a not too mathy response from vqc. They may have the link between the fractal and 4D and not know it.
it warps the lines to arcs and makes the arcs lines yup.
The switching from Euclidean to Polar brings in Tesla and EM. As each line is a sin and cos (Y and X), That creates an EM field if motion is added and that is time. So Tesla was not wrong. If you take that to the Planck level?
Quantum wave
The potential of the lines is square or wave,
The potential of the square is the hyper-square.
If you can't do 4D chess please don't try.
Honestly I don't know.
it would take a lining up of EM fields to produce gravity effect, and I don't really see that effect in matter as we perceive it. I am not sure. If most EM force lined up downward into mass then it could be 'gravity' - but no evidence of that.