TYB
anon finds this rather coincidental that the SPLC in US has just been exposed for paying
"white supremacists" groups in order to affect legislation.
And in AUS the identical playbook is running, with National Socialists group, but suddenly shut down in coordinated timing with the US exposure.
Are the AUS groups also funded via SPLC or some similar US NGO controlled by Dems?
It all feels way too familiar for anon to say the AUS groups were organic.
TYA
There's a difference between humor and purposeful undermining.
Looks like Russel Brand is joining the fake maga crew.
Anon surmises they're all either sleeper on a payroll,
or someone has got to them.
Maybe Brand got a deal in his rape accusation case?
Anywhoo, just reporting he's turned on Trump with the others, cucker etc.
If AJ had stuck to the SPLC type stuff, he'd be doing great.
>First Woman and Black Woman to Serve as Chair
KEK, a black woman paying white supremacists
is akin to a Jew painting a swastika on a synagogue.
I'm not wasting my own time with your distraction, you
can go look up the accurate decode for Chevron Overturn.
Too many others to mention, but this is anons pride and joy.
Well, other than the Boss quoting anon. That was huge for anon.
I know you don't have any decades, because you're a low IQ shill.
You're only here to attempt distraction. Loser.
Don't listen to loser shills anons, comms are good, mission forward.
NCSWIC
US embassy Jordan, tweet gone.
> the other side could do that, too!
Yep, sure they can, but they're too stupid.
And besides, even if they did,
NCSWIC
No
anons searched from loop capitol to every other connection under the sun,
you professional ones at least.
But little ol anon went his own way, no distractions.
#20237849 at 2024-01-13 19:54:31 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #24832: Caturday Afternoon Erection Time Travels Edition
Notable :…
Why did Q mention SIDLEY AUSTIN…??? It's about NET ZERO… Seems important in the grand scheme of Climate Change Agenda.
Is the End Really Nigh?
An Assessment of Oral Argument in the Chevron Deference Cases, and Projections of Possible Impacts Across the Regulatory Space
The Supreme Court has granted certiorari in two cases putting at issue the continued viability of the Chevron doctrine. Join SIDLEY's Regulatory Litigation group and leading appellate and regulatory practitioners for a discussion of the Chevron cases. SIDLEY lawyers will discuss the oral arguments before the Supreme Court, where the justices may be heading, how possible outcomes may impact various federal agencies and regulatory disciplines, and identifying the key doctrines, precedents, and practices in each space that rely on Chevron.
PANELISTS
4:00 p.m. ET | What we heard and where the Court is likely going.
David R. Carpenter, Moderator
Kwaku A. Akowuah
Tacy F. Flint
4:30 p.m. ET | Impact of possible outcomes on federal agencies.
Gordon D. Todd, Moderator
https://www.SIDLEY.com/en/insights/events/2024/01/is-the-end-really-nigh
What is "Chevron deference" …???
Looks like it's all about what the manufacturing industry regulations consider to be a SAUCE of pollution, specifically air pollution. So, this goes to the core of the CO2 argument.
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that set forth the legal test for when U.S. federal courts must defer to a government agency's interpretation of a law or statute.[1] The decision articulated a doctrine now known as "Chevron deference".[2] Chevron deference consists of a two-part test that is deferential to government agencies: first, whether Congress has spoken directly to the precise issue at Question, and second, "whether the agency's answer is based on a permissible construction of the statute."
The decision involved a legal challenge to a change in the U.S. government's interpretation of the word "source" in the Clean Air Act of 1963. The Act did not precisely define what constituted a "source" of air pollution. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) initially defined "source" to cover essentially any significant change or addition to a plant or factory. In 1981, the EPA changed its definition to be mean only an entire plant or factory. This allowed companies to build new projects without going through the EPA's lengthy new review process if they simultaneously modified other parts of their plant to reduce emissions so that the overall change in the plant's emissions was zero. Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmentalist advocacy group, successfully challenged the legality of the EPA's new definition.[3]
Chevron is one of the most important decisions in U.S. administrative law. It has been cited in thousands of cases since its issuance in 1984.[4]
Thirty-nine years later, in May 2023, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to reevaluate Chevron. Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, No. 22-451. A decision is expected in the first half of 2024.[5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v._Natural_Resources_Defense_Council,_Inc.
The case will be coming up before the Supreme Court mid 2024. Look out for this one, I suspect if Q called it out, it's because it's going to be a lose for Deep State/WEF pundits and a big win for western manufacturing. We will see, but this looks BIGLY…
ha ha…
>I was trying hard to decode everything Q wrote for a year (2018)!
anon correctly concluded before public or anon knowledge
that Chevron would be overturned.
yes it was a dig, but the drop was decoded
by this anon.
anon thinks you're just upset that you didn't find it.
Don't be upset, be happy for anon.
Treat others the way you would like to be treated,
and everything else falls in place.
God is watching over us and guiding us, and for sure He departs us the
wisdom to think clearly.
anyway, I'm just gonna wave it in your face.
I claim Sidley Austin anon status.
Will you allow me to have it, or you just gonna moan moar?
anon just went through qresear.ch for sidley austin.
Not one anon was eben close.
If anon relied on the teams consensus, anon would never have
solved the drop.
TY fren
There is a beautiful panic going on…
Observing Chuck is like watching a barometer.
and the weather will be a mite bit stormy.
How's that "whirlwind" turning out for ya Chuck?
https://x.com/SenSchumer/status/2047056480977702917
anon is not sure how to approach this.
anon feels it's something Boss should be aware of,
or made aware of…
anon has had a message from Jim (James) Watkins
that the New Zealand Government in Jims words,
"Their government personally attacked me."
anon does not know the xtent or details.
Just hoping Jim is safe.
not this anon, I'm not Jim.
This is all anon knows currently.
>>24528518
greetings nightshift.
TY
Oh, it's all so confusing sometimes, over anons morning covfefe.
Anon didn't mean to poast at cock poasting retard.
KEK
not even walking, sitting on trap, soon anon will flush the trap
and the shit will be gone.
>>24528562
Does Owen Shroyer even play golf?
You can close your nose all you like,
but you can't close your imagination.
Imagine the smell.
KEK
Does anon have to ask permission every time?
I donut believe anon has freedom to speak,
with that clogging his pie hole.
BTW, has anyone seen "this aspect of things", was he David Wilcox?
X22 Report
@X22Report
·
20m
Trump keeps saying we'll be "bringing back" the nuclear dust as if it was OURS before. That's not an accident. Obama gave Iran US uranium.
When Trump collects it, the isotope gets traced back to its origin. The jig is UP for Obama, Clinton and the rest.
https://x.com/X22Report/status/2047081936816865712
Imagine being the Boss and knowing what is really habbening,
facing this and having to keep your mouth shut.
That's a skill anon hasn't mastered.
Anon would have blurted out, "you paid them to pretend" or some such thing,
which would have made anon look crazy.
Kudos Boss, great skills.
Kamala Harris falsely accusing Trump of coddling the Charlottesville white supremacist rally exactly one month after she was endorsed by the SPLC—the group that planned, organized, & paid for the Charlottesville white supremacist rally.