TYB
where's thewould(s)do extra credit
From AI
The “recent asylum case” you’re referring to—where the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit blocked a presidential asylum restriction—was decided by a three-judge panel consisting of:
J. Michelle Childs (authored the majority opinion)
Cornelia Pillard (joined the majority)
Justin Walker (concurred in part and dissented in part)
In short: Childs and Pillard formed the majority, while Walker agreed on some points but disagreed with part of the ruling.
If you want, I can break down what each judge argued—that’s where the interesting legal differences show up.
Majority Opinion
J. Michelle Childs (joined by Cornelia Pillard)
Core conclusion: The administration likely exceeded its legal authority in restricting asylum.
Key reasoning:
Statutory limits matter
Congress, through the Immigration and Nationality Act, already laid out who can apply for asylum. The majority said the executive branch can’t rewrite those rules broadly.
Right to seek asylum is explicit
The law allows noncitizens physically present in the U.S. to apply for asylum, regardless of how they entered. The policy tried to narrow that in a way the judges said conflicts with the statute.
Separation of powers
The opinion emphasizes that immigration policy—even at the border—must stay within boundaries set by Congress. The President can’t override that framework unilaterally.
Procedural concerns
The rule was also viewed as likely violating administrative law requirements (e.g., proper rulemaking and justification).
👉 Bottom line: The majority saw this as an overreach of executive power that likely contradicts existing law.
Partial Dissent / Concurrence
Justin Walker
Core view: He agreed on some procedural concerns but thought the court went too far blocking the policy.
Key reasoning:
More deference to the executive
Walker argued courts should give the executive branch greater flexibility in immigration and border control, especially in urgent or high-volume situations.
Statutory interpretation difference
He read the same law as allowing more discretion for the President to impose conditions or limits on asylum eligibility.
Scope of relief
He was critical of broadly blocking the policy nationwide, suggesting the remedy should be narrower.
👉 Bottom line: Walker saw the policy as arguably within executive authority, or at least not clearly unlawful enough to justify a sweeping block.
The Real Divide
At its core, the disagreement comes down to:
Majority: Congress already set the rules → Executive can’t override them
Walker: The law leaves room → Executive deserves flexibility, especially at the border
new witness protection member
you know the drill anon
11.3
New York Post
@nypost
King Charles will be treated to historic military first during US visit, White House schedule reveals https://trib.al/GD75lfB
Image
12:45 PM · Apr 25, 2026
·
3,397
Views
https://x.com/nypost/status/2048081026908307791
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2048007645471125653
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
The fact that I wasn’t funded by the SPLC proves I’m not a Nazi
7:54 AM · Apr 25, 2026
·
29.4M
Views
couldn't sayasiancause jeets included in that
japis too restrictive as it could bekoolieaka Chinaman (et al)
it's all about da eyes anon
This right?
High-confidence narrowed location
Coastal Mekong Delta — likely Sóc Trăng / Bạc Liêu province region (southern Vietnam)
Why this specific zone (not just “somewhere in the delta”)
-
Ultra-dense shrimp pond grid
The image shows:
Very tight, uniform rectangular ponds
Mixed coloration (active vs inactive ponds)
Interspersed natural channels
That pattern is signature coastal aquaculture, especially:
Sóc Trăng
Bạc Liêu
Cà Mau
These provinces are the epicenter of shrimp farming in Vietnam.
In fact, the majority of Vietnam’s shrimp aquaculture is concentrated in the Mekong Delta coastal belt
-
Narrow, elongated “island strips”
Your image shows long, tapered landforms between channels.
That strongly suggests:
Tidal-influenced distributaries
Sediment ridges near the coast
Not upstream river islands
This matches the estuaries near the South China Sea (East Sea), not inland Mekong branches.
-
Mixed natural + engineered water system
Notice:
Curving natural channels (greenish, irregular)
Straight-edged pond grids (human-made)
That hybrid pattern is exactly what you see in:
Rice–shrimp integrated systems widely used in coastal Mekong areas
-
Visual match to known aerial imagery
Aerial footage from:
Sóc Trăng province shows almost identical patchwork shrimp ponds embedded in waterways
Your image is basically a textbook satellite view of that system.
Brandon Gill
@realBrandonGill
Without open borders, there would be no Democratic Party. The Americans harmed and killed by illegal aliens, the workers displaced by cheap foreign labor, and the decay in America's culture is nothing to the Democrat machine but collateral damage in their thirst for power.
12:00 PM · Apr 25, 2026
·
15.6K
Views
https://x.com/realBrandonGill/status/2048069584213680578