dChan
Anonymous ID: bf9f5c April 30, 2026, 6:29 p.m. No.24560224   🗄️.is 🔗kun

To see all of these topics bunched together in a lawsuit is wild. As millions of people will see all of this that may never have considered any of it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69A8TzAGHlU

Anonymous ID: bf9f5c April 30, 2026, 9:36 p.m. No.24560797   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0800

Prolly nothing.

But would other anon download this cid and clip this one area.

Candace says “for. Two years,”

.?? while describing events relating to yet another Charlie Kirk “event” detail about her lawyer and another lawyer.

It hasn’t even been tow years since Charlie got “shot”, so maybe I am confused, but why is two years even in convo?

 

This is all about the Fort Huachuca controversy.

 

Listen from ———@33::00——— then @34:00-ish forward ——-pay attention——-that is when she says

 

—these two lawyers—

 

“have had full access to each other and have been in COMMUNICATION for TWO YEARS”.

 

…..?????? That confuses me? Did she just accidentally tell her audience she is part of this timeline MOVIE….we are all watching…? Why are these two lawyers in communication the past two years related to Candace?

Unless—

It is an accidental tell——

That considering timeline of her last job was two years ago was Daily Wire——so why would a TPUSA attorney for Harpole——-be in communication with Candace Owens attorney before Charlie event?———-unless that is the accidental slip of tongue——-that TPUSA is in fact entangled with Daily Wire? And these last two years of “in conversation” with each other was regarding Candace firing from Daily Wire, which shows that Daily Wire (Israel) in fact has its claws into TPUSA before Charlie “died”.

Or is there attorney talk because actors do work out contracts for movie roles.

 

 

If this is the case, it is a proof that the Charlie Kirk part of Movie has been going on at minimum two years. What drops would correlate to the timeline she is speaking of.

Worth listening to the entire part of this episode as it pertains to if it were to really go to trial, Harpole -vs- Owens, it will require the full drone video that is in question, which will be dasting new angles and views, as this all stems from talk about no first aid rendered, no ambulance, etc.

 

Any how she says this and I am confused.

Maybe one of you will listen to entire and make better sense of it.

 

https://www.youtube.com/live/69A8TzAGHlU?si=JdsRCby_auxi3bWv

 

 

 

—————-

 

She has been gone from TPUSA since 2019

And gone from Daily Wire since 2024.