>wtf is this???
Diffraction spikes introduced by secondary mirror supports in the optical system. Very common in astronomy. The light source in the video is quite bright.
>wtf is this???
Diffraction spikes introduced by secondary mirror supports in the optical system. Very common in astronomy. The light source in the video is quite bright.
>drone inspecting windmills?
Observational test. Hot drone hiding from radar in the ground clutter of the windmills.
Yo, Marco. S'up, bro?
>the pdfs probably have more in them than this
The pdfs will have anecdotal testimony, will read like FBI 302s, and will have no more practical value to UFO-enthusiasts than reading about bigfoot sightings does for bigfoot-enthusiasts.
>what is it now? an actual site photo or a lab rendered shit pic?
It's a photo of the actual site with a graphic overlay created by the FBI that depicts eyewitness reports.
"Actual site photo with graphic overlay depicting eyewitness reportsโฆ"
>maybe.
It's a parachute flare. The diffraction spikes are not an object, but an image artifact caused by the bright (and hot) flare. When zoomed in you can see a trail or plume from a drifting flare. At 1:20 the parachute enters the frame from the left.
>they should state what the temperature of the object is. if it's like burning hot then yeah of course it's something like that
The video appears to be of a FLIR display. All of the data that would be present to an observer has been censored (those black bars). Since the parachute is much cooler - almost at ambient temperature - it has little contrast in the image but it is there at nine o'clock around 1:19 elapsed.
>I donโt get it. I must just be so stupid
You don't see their debts, bills, or cash flow, Anon.