President Obama Highlights an Ongoing ‘Conspiracy Against Rights’ During Interview with Media
May 9, 2026 | Sundance |
I have been requested to put some context behind a recent set of statements made by former President Barack Obama to Stephen Colbert.
As many interested observers understand (some may gain deeper appreciation later on)statements -even defensive- made in furtherance of a conspiracy can be used later in court to highlight intent.
To encapsulate for those who requested,we first start with the recent statement by the former President. Listen closely:
On May 19, 2020, Acting DNI Richard Grenell declassified the hidden paragraph of the Susan Rice memo that was hidden for three years. This enabled us to put a full context to the ‘memo to file‘ that was published by Susan Rice on January 20, 2017; an event that was timed to happen during President Trump’s inauguration.
The context was President Obama and Susan Rice holding a meeting with FBI Director James Comey during the transition period approximately two weeks before President Trump took office. On January 5, 2017, President Obama and Susan Rice were discussing incoming National Security Advisor Michael Flynn with FBI Director James Comey.
When you understand the context, you understand exactly why the Intelligence Community tried to keep this paragraph hidden. The motive to write the January 20, 2017, memo is clear. Also, the IC did not ever expect this to be released. Here’s the formerly hidden paragraph:
rice-letter-declassified-v2-classified-paragraph.jpg
Within this paragraph we find the motive for Susan Rice writing it (emphasis mine):
“Director Comey affirmedthat he is proceeding “by the book” as it relates to law enforcement.” … “Comey said he does have some concerns that incoming NSA Flynn is speaking frequently with Russian Ambassador Kislyak.” “Comey said that could be an issue as it relates to sharing senssitive information.” “President Obama asked if Comey was saying that the NSC should not pass sensitive information related to Russia to Flynn.” “Comey replied “potentially.”” “He added that he has no indication thus far that Flynn has passed classified information to Kislyak, but he noted that “the level of communication is unusual.”
Remember, the position of President Obama and Susan Rice is that they were never aware of any FBI investigation of Flynn (or the Trump campaign); nor did they have any involvement in directing it to take place.
The content of this January 5th meeting makes the first part of their claim challenging to accept. Thus, the need for Susan Rice to cover for it.
Here’s the full memo in context(including the redacted paragraph):
susan-rice-memo-1-v2.jpg
On January 5, 2017, James Comey officially put President Obama on notice about the FBI conducting an investigation and surveillance upon the Trump campaign. Obviously, Obama already knew this; however, at these moments in real time each of the participants was trying to protect themselves by documenting all of the activity and making sure the entire group was attached to the legal risk if anything went wrong.
Now it gets a little uncomfortable for the Obama White Househere because just a few days earlier DNI James Clapper created a document trail from the FBI to the Office of The President. That trail created by Clapper was problematic, and that’s why the January 5th meeting was organized…
We learned from James Comey’s testimony, that a day or two prior to this January 5, 2017 meeting, DNI James Clapper briefed President Obama on the nature of the call between Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak and Michael Flynn.
Question: Ms Rice how can you claim to have no knowledge of an FBI investigation when the FBI was providing the White House FBI with intercepts of Flynn communication?
Are you saying the FBI intercepts were not authorized by President Obama?…
https://x.com/theblaze/status/2052018359542153235?s=20