>>24590309 LB
Mother's Day
Good Day for a MOAB
117 replies | 78 images | 25 UIDs
Pathetic Shiilery
Musk still on the take.
BMNTP
https://web3.okx.com/token/solana/6EQKNJD6KMTQv9KmhKDjs1jm1SRsNVGNqdKeEEiJpump
Over 150 quakes, including 4.5 magnitude, rattle CA during earthquake swarm
45
150
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qw8lTQWf-E
45
Nov 02, 2017 12:36:31 PM EDT
Anonymous ID: zGyR4tyi No. 147632662
Follow Huma.
What just broke w/ Huma?
What did HRC instruct Huma to do re: Classified markings?
Why is this story just now coming out?
What relevance does it have?
Why is Donna running for cover?
Was a deal granted in exchange for something?
Who made the deal?
Do we care about Donna or those who instructed her to violate the law?
Why is this being leaked v. simply prosecuted privately?
Who is attempting to change the narrative and soften the acts that are forthcoming this weekend?
150
Nov 13, 2017 1:04:46 PM EST
Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: /lc4nimE No. 149262582
Distress cal[L]s to others will [d]o you/family no good at this stage. We know whe[R]e you/the family are at all times and can hear you breathing.
Q
D7g^-%19FZBx_decline
>got a bad feeling about this Huntavirus narrative taking shape,
No Fear Patriot.
v2 dead in the water.
Scare Event, but we already KNEW this.
Round 'em' up
Firefighters fight early-morning blaze at downtown L.A. commercial building
PreDICKtable
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSdGAn4dz84
Just for S&G's
Just like Facefuck, Twat was a DARPA mind fuck.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Corp._v._Operation_Bluebird
X Corp. v.Operation Bluebird
X Corp. v. Operation Bluebird is a legal dispute in the United States concerning the ownership and continued validity of the Twitter trademark following the rebranding of the social media platform Twitter to X in 2023. The case involves X Corp., the company that owns and operates the platform X, formerly known as "Twitter", and Operation Bluebird, a startup seeking to launch a new social media service using the name "Twitter".
The dispute centers on whether the "Twitter" trademark was effectively abandoned after the rebranding, and whether another company may legally register or use the name.
Background
In July 2023, X Corp., owned by entrepreneur Elon Musk, rebranded the social media platform Twitter as X. The rebranding included the removal of the well-known bird logo, the replacement of the domain name twitter.com with x.com, and the gradual elimination of terminology such as "tweet" and "retweet" from the platform's branding. A 2023 post said that the company was ready to "bid adieu to the Twitter brand and, gradually, all the birds".[1]
In 2025, the startup Operation Bluebird announced plans to launch a new social networking service under the name twitter.new. The company also filed a petition with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) seeking cancellation of several Twitter-related trademarks, and a new "Twitter" trademark for itself. Operation Bluebird argued that X Corp. had abandoned the trademarks by ceasing active commercial use of the brand. The petition was filed by Stephen Coates, who used to work as a trademark lawyer for Twitter, and now works for Operation Bluebird.[1]
X Corp. updated X's terms of service as a result of the case. It now says that X and Twitter's names, logos domain names and other distinctive features can not be used by others without permission; formerly it only mentioned X.[2]
Legal claims
Operation Bluebird argued that the rebranding of Twitter to X constituted trademark abandonment under U.S. trademark law. According to the company, the removal of the Twitter name, logos, and terminology from the platform demonstrated an intent to discontinue use of the mark.[2][3]
X Corp. rejected these claims and filed legal action against Operation Bluebird. The company argued that the Twitter trademarks remained valid and enforceable, and that the attempt to use the name by another company constituted trademark infringement.[1]
X Corp. further stated that the Twitter brand remains historically associated with its platform, that the trademarks were not relinquished despite the rebranding, and that it would cause consumer confusion.[1]
Analysis
Josh Gerben, a trademark attorney based on Washington DC, who has been following the case, considered it very unlikely for Operation Bluebird to win the case. He pointed out that popular recognition still associates the "Twitter" brand to the X Corp. corporation. He also pointed out that there are no similar precedents of a company dissociating itself from such a big brand.[4]
>QResearch Wave
1 post(s) found containing "Hands Up".
1933
Aug 26, 2018 11:46:38 AM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 2a2c4f No. 2743167
Suicide weekend?
HANDS UP?
[30]
[0:28]
Impossible?
Coincidence?
We are in control.
BIG week ahead.
Q
Operation Monarch
Demons with snake looking skin, fucking a woman that looks unconscious.
Yeah. GO DANA you sick fuck!
Where is this taken? It's on the UFC site.
STOP GLORIFY THIS SHIT
IT'S DEMONIC MENTAL FUCKERY
But, "muh Idols…."
FFS
Guess this is one of the "Difficult Truths"
Eying everyone in TRUMPS orbit moar closely is necessary for the easily persued Idol worshiping anons.
HARD LINE.
NO MOAR GLORIFYING DEGENERACY
NO MOAR SECRECY OR PROTECTION FOR THE WICKED.
TRUTH, TRANSPARENCY and EQUAL JUSTICE.