baker here
I can bake
I posted on the last bread, but not as baker. Am experienced night baker, but we can wait for BO/BV to confirm.
Nice to see you my always clutch brothah. I'll prolly be good for the night, but if you WANT to bake (bc shill love is best love) lemme know, kek. Daybaker still out on 2nd long weekend, so we may need good baker in the AM. If I start now, my eyes crap out after 8-9 hrs, not always BV coverage for handoff. (And you prolly know who this is, but…)
For anons that like to do their own czech on baker
Most recent bakes: #3084-87
I reviewed the notes on this topic, and I thought moar ppl wanted it left in. Topics threads are avenues of interest, not diggs/vetted habbenings. Notables on QR should be vetted, IMO, but I see no problem with having a looser standard for inquiry threads. We're all about free speech, we're not saying we endorse those topics as accurate, just that some here find them of interest.
Well yeah, the notables debate and criteria for vetting has always been flex, bc each baker sets it. We've made standards b4, but the interpretations of them are still pretty varied. We just need to peer-review each other here–call out baker's missed/fluff/incorrect notes w/reason why, until we get a little closer to a consensus that meets discerning anons' standards. I also advocate for anons' asking their bakers to post recent bakes b4 starting a baking session, so anons can review their past work. Accountability tends to make all of us try to be at the top of our game.
> I'll see about relocating a bit early today
That'd be great, fren. TY
But no worries if you can't,
we'll figure something out.
Newfags, we prefer you lurk (just read, no post) awhile b4 joining in. We do research (diggs) here mainly, so posts are best reserved for diggs and comments on diggs. But we're glad you're here. Read our Welcome to help explain our unique culture. Free from PC, but it can be pretty hard core when anons fight to keep it that way, kek!
https://8ch.net/qresearch/welcome.html
#3102
>>2460315 Graf compiling MSM headlines on QAnon
>>2460366, >>2460401, >>2460419 Anons guess [20]=20 pg's Nunes.others want declas
>>2460260 NEW Q: There is a reason we needed to go mainstream b4 EVIDENCE drop
>>2459881 Call to dig Liddle David Remnick, Moscow correspondent for WaPo
>>2459772 Article summarizing the POTUS/Feinstein sparring match, incl Rally
>>2459759 Pocahontas hints at running in 2020 on race-baiting. Related Q drop