Anonymous ID: 72c431 May 13, 2026, 11:46 p.m. No.24603357   🗄️.is 🔗kun

e05b5ab766f308088eaf1e3ceb701e2f7e999ed667fc2437ddedd899c46405b0.jpg

 

Step 1: Read the 1st sentence re: [RR]

Step 2: Read the NYT article re: [RR] wear wire

Attempts to BAIT POTUS to FIRE to cross RED LINE will FAIL.

FISA DECLAS WILL BRING THE HOUSE DOWN.

Q

Anonymous ID: 72c431 May 14, 2026, 12:25 a.m. No.24603385   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3387 >>3391

>>24603331

Patenting Genes

 

A gene patent is a patent on a specific isolated gene sequence, a natural sequence that has been altered, the processes and methods for obtaining or using it, or a combination of any of these. In the United States, gene patents have only been granted to gene sequences that have known functions.

 

In 1980, the first patent for a living organism was filed, but was rejected by a patent examiner for the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The patent was filed for a newly created bacterium that Ananda Chakrabarty, a microbiologist, had created for digesting crude oil in oil spills. Chakrabarty appealed, arguing that although the USPTO does not allow patents on living organisms, if it is “man-madeâ€, such as through genetic engineering, then such an organism is patentable. In a 5-4 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in the Diamond v. Chakrabarty trial, Chakrabarty was awarded a patent for the microorganism he created. Current patent law prohibits the patenting of laws of nature or natural phenomena. Although genes are certainly natural phenomena, some believe the act of isolating and studying them makes them patentable under the Chakrabarty ruling. Others disagree and don’t believe gene sequences should be patentable. Although lower courts have heard cases involving gene patents (see below), the Supreme Court has yet to weigh in.

 

https://knowgenetics.org/patenting-genes/

Anonymous ID: 72c431 May 14, 2026, 12:47 a.m. No.24603396   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3398 >>3402 >>3404 >>3405

>>24603391

The genetic code within living organisms can potentially be co-opted to store information. Furthermore synthetic biology can be used to engineer cells with "molecular recorders" to allow the storage and retrieval of information stored in the cell's genetic material.[1] CRISPR gene editing can also be used to insert artificial DNA sequences into the genome of the cell.[1] For encoding developmental lineage data (molecular flight recorder), roughly 30 trillion cell nuclei per mouse * 60 recording sites per nucleus * 7-15 bits per site yields about 2 terabytes per mouse written (but only very selectively read).[9]

 

In-vivo light-based direct image and data recording

edit

A proof-of-concept in-vivo direct DNA data recording system was demonstrated through incorporation of optogenetically regulated recombinases as part of an engineered "molecular recorder" allows for direct encoding of light-based stimuli into engineered E.coli cells.[10] This approach can also be parallelized to store and write text or data in 8-bit form through the use of physically separated individual cell cultures in cell-culture plates.

 

wiki